Saradha and Another vs Veeraraghavan and one another — 153/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d),37(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKP120004012018

Filing Number

153/2018

Filing Date

01-Aug-2018

Registration No

153/2018

Registration Date

01-Aug-2018

Court

District Munsif Court, Sriperumbudur

Judge

1-District Munsif

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d),37(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Saradha and Another

    Adv. M.B.Velmurugan and N.Shanmugasundharam

  2. 2.Pushpa

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Veeraraghavan and one another

  2. 2.Jeeva

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The District Munsif court dismissed the plaintiffs' partition suit, finding they failed to prove the property was purchased from the deceased husband's income. Evidence showed the 1st defendant purchased the property at age 20 from his own employment income starting at age 16, not from joint family contributions. The court also rejected the challenge to the 2000 sale deed as time-barred and noted the plaintiffs' suppression of other properties in their schedule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  11. 28-Nov-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  12. 23-Oct-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  13. 25-Sep-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  14. 11-Aug-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  15. 31-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  16. 24-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  17. 14-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  18. 07-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  19. 23-Jun-2025

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  20. 12-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  21. 28-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  22. 23-Apr-2025

    Amendment

    District Munsif

  23. 16-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  24. 15-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  25. 02-Apr-2025

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  26. 02-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  27. 24-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  28. 14-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  29. 28-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  30. 14-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  31. 07-Jan-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  32. 21-Nov-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  33. 16-Nov-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  34. 30-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  35. 23-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  36. 15-Jul-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  37. 18-Jun-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  38. 02-Apr-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  39. 27-Feb-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  40. 30-Jan-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  41. 05-Jan-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  42. 22-Dec-2023

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  43. 22-Dec-2023

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  44. 13-Dec-2023

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  45. 31-Oct-2023

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  46. 20-Sep-2023

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  47. 21-Jul-2023

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  48. 22-Jun-2023

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  49. 19-Apr-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  50. 03-Apr-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  51. 24-Jan-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  52. 09-Dec-2022

    Trial

    District Munsif

  53. 29-Nov-2022

    Trial

    District Munsif

  54. 15-Sep-2022

    Trial

    District Munsif

  55. 02-Sep-2022

    Trial

    District Munsif

  56. 25-Jul-2022

    Trial

    District Munsif

  57. 04-Jul-2022

    Trial

    District Munsif

  58. 28-Mar-2022

    Trial

    District Munsif

  59. 02-Feb-2022

    Trial

    District Munsif

  60. 02-Nov-2021

    Trial

    District Munsif

  61. 09-Sep-2021

    Trial

    District Munsif

  62. 12-Jul-2021

    Trial

    District Munsif

  63. 09-Jun-2021

    Trial

    District Munsif

  64. 23-Apr-2021

    Trial

    District Munsif

  65. 01-Mar-2021

    Trial

    District Munsif

  66. 09-Feb-2021

    Trial

    District Munsif

  67. 29-Jan-2021

    Issues

    District Munsif

  68. 04-Jan-2021

    Issues

    District Munsif

  69. 23-Jul-2020

    Issues

    District Munsif

  70. 08-May-2020

    Issues

    District Munsif

  71. 21-Apr-2020

    Issues

    District Munsif

  72. 04-Feb-2020

    Issues

    District Munsif

  73. 24-Oct-2019

    Issues

    District Munsif

  74. 16-Jul-2019

    Issues

    District Munsif

  75. 25-Apr-2019

    Issues

    District Munsif

  76. 29-Jan-2019

    Issues

    District Munsif

  77. 20-Nov-2018

    Issues

    District Munsif

  78. 09-Oct-2018

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  79. 03-Sep-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  80. 01-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 153/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The District Munsif court dismissed the plaintiffs' partition suit, finding they failed to prove the property was purchased from the deceased husband's income. Evidence showed the 1st defendant purchased the property at age 20 from his own employment income starting at age 16, not from joint family contributions. The court also rejected the challenge to the 2000 sale deed as time-barred and noted the plaintiffs' suppression of other properties in their schedule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case