Shakeela vs S.M.Aameena Begam — 99/2019
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25(d). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKP080003522019
Filing Number
432/2019
Filing Date
06-Jun-2019
Registration No
99/2019
Registration Date
20-Jun-2019
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
3-Principal District Munsif
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shakeela
Adv. D.Vinothan
Respondent(s)
-
1.S.M.Aameena Begam
-
2.S.Shagir Basha
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Apr-2026
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
28-Apr-2026
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
17-Apr-2026
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
08-Apr-2026
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
26-Mar-2026
For further Proceedings
Principal District Munsif
-
23-Mar-2026
For further Proceedings
Principal District Munsif
-
12-Mar-2026
For further Proceedings
Principal District Munsif
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
06-Jan-2026
Appearance
Principal District Munsif
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
17-Nov-2025
Oral EvidenceView PDF
Case Summary: O.S No. 99/2019 Date: 17.11.2025 Court: Principal District Munsif, Kancheepuram This is a property dispute case where petitioner Shakeela (wife of Allah Aqsha) contested property claims against respondents S.M. Aameena Begam and S. Shagir Basha. The court concluded the cross-examination of the second respondent after examining documentary evidence regarding property schedules, sale deeds from 1975, and subsequent property divisions. The court found inconsistencies in the respondent's testimony regarding property particulars listed in Schedule B and rejected claims of improper encroachment. The cross-examination was completed with no further examination ordered. The case remains pending on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
07-Nov-2025
Oral EvidenceView PDF
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
28-Oct-2025
Oral EvidenceView PDF
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
13-Aug-2025
Oral EvidenceView PDF
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
31-Jul-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
23-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
09-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
06-Jun-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
25-Mar-2025
Issues
Principal District Munsif
-
13-Feb-2025
Issues
Principal District Munsif
-
21-Dec-2024
Issues
Principal District Munsif
-
10-Dec-2024
Issues
Principal District Munsif
-
20-Nov-2024
Issues
Principal District Munsif
-
24-Oct-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
25-Sep-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
02-Sep-2024
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
28-Aug-2024
Restored
Principal District Munsif
-
28-Aug-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
07-Aug-2019
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
07-Aug-2019
Copy of DecreeView PDF
-
07-Aug-2019
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
07-Aug-2019
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
07-Aug-2019
Disposed
Principal District Munsif
-
26-Jul-2019
Judgement
Principal District Munsif
-
24-Jul-2019
Judgement
Principal District Munsif
-
22-Jul-2019
Arguments
Principal District Munsif
-
27-Jun-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jun-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 99/2019
Case Summary: O.S No. 99/2019 Date: 17.11.2025 Court: Principal District Munsif, Kancheepuram This is a property dispute case where petitioner Shakeela (wife of Allah Aqsha) contested property claims against respondents S.M. Aameena Begam and S. Shagir Basha. The court concluded the cross-examination of the second respondent after examining documentary evidence regarding property schedules, sale deeds from 1975, and subsequent property divisions. The court found inconsistencies in the respondent's testimony regarding property particulars listed in Schedule B and rejected claims of improper encroachment. The cross-examination was completed with no further examination ordered. The case remains pending on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts