Jayaseelan and another vs state by, the inspector of police, Uthiramerur police station, Kanchipuram disStrict. Advocate - E L KANNAN — 533/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKP060008912026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

655/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

533/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District and Sessions Court, Kancheepuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

47

Police Station

UTHIRAMERUR POLICE STATION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jayaseelan and another

    Adv. NAVEEN V

  2. 2.Uthirakumar

    Adv. NAVEEN V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state by, the inspector of police, Uthiramerur police station, Kanchipuram disStrict. Advocate - E L KANNAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 533/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Court, Kancheepuram granted anticipatory bail to Jayaseelan and Uthirakumar, who faced charges under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(2). The court accepted a compromise memo filed by the defacto complainant, who stated no objection to bail. Each petitioner must execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and appear daily before police until further orders, while refraining from tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 533/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 533/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Court, Kancheepuram granted anticipatory bail to Jayaseelan and Uthirakumar, who faced charges under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(2). The court accepted a compromise memo filed by the defacto complainant, who stated no objection to bail. Each petitioner must execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and appear daily before police until further orders, while refraining from tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case