Ravi vs Walajabad PS Advocate - E L KANNAN — 532/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 17th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKP060008892026
Filing Number
654/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
532/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District and Sessions Court, Kancheepuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
369
Police Station
WALAJBAD POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ravi
Adv. Thirumalai.B
Respondent(s)
-
1.Walajabad PS (Police Station) Advocate - E L KANNAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.532/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Court, Kancheepuram dismissed Ravi's bail petition on 17 March 2026. Ravi, aged 61, was arrested on 05.03.2026 for alleged offences under sections 296(b), 78(1) of BNS read with Section 4 of TNPHW Act, involving sexual harassment and criminal intimidation. The court rejected bail despite the petitioner's arguments regarding his age, health (diabetic), clean criminal record, and family circumstances (including a son with 70% brain disability), considering the serious nature of accusations and preliminary investigation stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Await Notice
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 532/2026
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.532/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Court, Kancheepuram dismissed Ravi's bail petition on 17 March 2026. Ravi, aged 61, was arrested on 05.03.2026 for alleged offences under sections 296(b), 78(1) of BNS read with Section 4 of TNPHW Act, involving sexual harassment and criminal intimidation. The court rejected bail despite the petitioner's arguments regarding his age, health (diabetic), clean criminal record, and family circumstances (including a son with 70% brain disability), considering the serious nature of accusations and preliminary investigation stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts