Pruthviraj vs The Inspector of Police — 894/2026

Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKI010015332026

Filing Number

1189/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

894/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Krishnagiri

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

42

Police Station

CIVIL SUPPLIES CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT(CSCID),KRISHNAGIRI

Year

2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pruthviraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 894/2026 Court Decision: The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed Pruthviraj and Manikanta's bail petition, denying their release from judicial custody. Key Reasoning: The court found that the accused were caught attempting to illegally transport 18,200 kg of PDS (Public Distribution System) rice without authorization, which was seized along with their vehicle. The court considered the early stage of investigation, the serious nature of the offense, and the confirmed identity of the seized rice as PDS material in rejecting bail, determining that release would prejudice the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 894/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 894/2026 Court Decision: The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed Pruthviraj and Manikanta's bail petition, denying their release from judicial custody. Key Reasoning: The court found that the accused were caught attempting to illegally transport 18,200 kg of PDS (Public Distribution System) rice without authorization, which was seized along with their vehicle. The court considered the early stage of investigation, the serious nature of the offense, and the confirmed identity of the seized rice as PDS material in rejecting bail, determining that release would prejudice the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case