si ofpolice sathyamangalam vs Rajkumar — 74/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNED070005952021

Filing Number

595/2021

Filing Date

03-May-2021

Registration No

74/2021

Registration Date

03-May-2021

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sathyamangalam

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

654

Police Station

Sathyamangalam Police Station

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 457,380

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.si ofpolice sathyamangalam

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajkumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Sathyamangalam acquitted accused Rajkumar of charges under IPC Sections 457 (burglary) and 380 (theft) related to a temple theft case. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the government's evidence—primarily consisting of a confessional statement and recovered items—lacked sufficient corroboration from credible witnesses who directly witnessed the alleged theft at Kondathu Kaliyamman Temple in November 2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 01-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 07-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 12-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 01-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 02-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 07-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 27-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 19-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 01-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 17-Aug-2023

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 05-Jun-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  24. 07-Mar-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 06-Dec-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 16-Nov-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 04-Nov-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 31-Oct-2022

    Copies

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 30-Aug-2022

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 13-Jun-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 13-Apr-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 28-Jan-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 29-Dec-2021

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 01-Oct-2021

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  35. 03-Aug-2021

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  36. 03-May-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 03-May-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 74/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Sathyamangalam acquitted accused Rajkumar of charges under IPC Sections 457 (burglary) and 380 (theft) related to a temple theft case. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the government's evidence—primarily consisting of a confessional statement and recovered items—lacked sufficient corroboration from credible witnesses who directly witnessed the alleged theft at Kondathu Kaliyamman Temple in November 2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case