Canara Bank KKeeranur Branch Represented by its Branch Manager vs K Velusamy, S/o.Kandasamy Gounder — 236/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDERVIIRULE1. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled out of court on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDG190006532025

e-Filing Number

03-12-2025

Filing Number

628/2025

Filing Date

10-Dec-2025

Registration No

236/2025

Registration Date

12-Dec-2025

Court

Sub Court, Oddanchathiram

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled out of court

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDERVIIRULE1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Canara Bank KKeeranur Branch Represented by its Branch Manager

    Adv. Siva kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K Velusamy, S/o.Kandasamy Gounder

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  3. 20-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  4. 21-Jan-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Subordinate Judge at Oddanchatram allowed Canara Bank's petition for attachment of property before judgment under CPC Order 38 Rule 5 in a money recovery suit against K. Velusamy. The court found that the defendant failed to furnish security despite proper notice and was attempting to evade liability, and revenue records confirmed the property belonged to the defendant. The court ordered attachment of specified agricultural land parcels by February 20, 2026, with a total government valuation of approximately Rs. 22,89,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 21-Jan-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 236/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Subordinate Judge at Oddanchatram allowed Canara Bank's petition for attachment of property before judgment under CPC Order 38 Rule 5 in a money recovery suit against K. Velusamy. The court found that the defendant failed to furnish security despite proper notice and was attempting to evade liability, and revenue records confirmed the property belonged to the defendant. The court ordered attachment of specified agricultural land parcels by February 20, 2026, with a total government valuation of approximately Rs. 22,89,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case