Kairunnissa and one another vs M.Fazlur rahman and two another — 198/2022

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDG190005082022

Evidence

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

256/2022

Filing Date

02-01-2022

Registration No

198/2022

Registration Date

02-01-2022

Court

Sub Court, Oddanchathiram

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 37(2)
IA/1/2024 Classification : Final Decree Petition Section Kairunnissa and one anotherM.Fazlur rahman and two another
IA/2/2024 Classification : Petition to Set-aside Exparte Order or Decree Section SenthikumarKairunnissa and one another

Petitioner(s)

Kairunnissa and one another

Respondent(s)

M.Fazlur rahman and two another

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Oddanchathiram

24-04-2026

Evidence

09-04-2026

Evidence

02-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

06-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

07-07-2025
Copy of Order
07-07-2025
Copy of Decree
17-07-2025
Copy of Order
29-08-2025
Copy of Order
05-11-2025
Copy of Order
29-01-2026
Copy of Order

Summary: The petition filed by Kairunnisa and K. Khalil Rahman to amend the plaint in Original Suit No. 198/2022 under Order 6 Rule 17 and Section 151 of C.P.C was allowed without costs by the Subordinate Judge, Oddanchatram on January 29, 2026. The court found the application simple in nature with sufficient grounds in the petition and affidavit, and noted that the nature of the suit was not altered by the amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Kairunnisa and K. Khalil Rahman to amend the plaint in Original Suit No. 198/2022 under Order 6 Rule 17 and Section 151 of C.P.C was allowed without costs by the Subordinate Judge, Oddanchatram on January 29, 2026. The court found the application simple in nature with sufficient grounds in the petition and affidavit, and noted that the nature of the suit was not altered by the amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Oddanchathiram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case