M.Kaja Mohaideen vs C.Sheik Ravuthar — 56/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d), 27(c). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 30th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG100024872024
Filing Number
64/2024
Filing Date
10-Dec-2024
Registration No
56/2024
Registration Date
10-Dec-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Natham
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M.Kaja Mohaideen
Adv. Gandhinathan
Respondent(s)
-
1.C.Sheik Ravuthar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The District Munsiff Court in Nattam ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring that a property gifted through a deed in 2014 belongs to the plaintiff and ordering the defendant to vacate within 2 months, transfer possession to the plaintiff, and not create any impediments. The court found the plaintiff's evidence (including the gift deed, property tax receipts, and witness testimony) credible and established his ownership rights over the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgement
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Amendment
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
02-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Oct-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Oct-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Sep-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
12-Sep-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Aug-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jul-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
25-Jul-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
25-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jun-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jun-2025
Trial
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2025
Enquiry
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2025
Enquiry
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jan-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 56/2024
Court Decision Summary The District Munsiff Court in Nattam ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring that a property gifted through a deed in 2014 belongs to the plaintiff and ordering the defendant to vacate within 2 months, transfer possession to the plaintiff, and not create any impediments. The court found the plaintiff's evidence (including the gift deed, property tax receipts, and witness testimony) credible and established his ownership rights over the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts