Muralidharan and 2 others vs The Inspector of Police, Nilakottai PS — 613/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNDG010015672026

Filing Number

804/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

613/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Dindugul

Judge

2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

1.Muralidharan and 2 others

Respondent(s)

1.The Inspector of Police, Nilakottai PS (Police Station)

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
16-Mar-2026

Copy of OrderView PDF

The Additional District and Sessions Court, Dindigul dismissed the bail petition filed by three accused (Muralidharan, Sangilimurugan, and Muthupandi) in a criminal case involving serious charges including murder under Section 302 IPC. The court rejected bail primarily because the accused had previously breached bail conditions by failing to appear in court, resulting in non-bailable warrants, and the trial had advanced to the defence evidence stage, making them ineligible for discretionary bail relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
16-Mar-2026

Disposed

Addl. District and Sessions Judge
12-Mar-2026

Orders

Addl. District and Sessions Judge
11-Mar-2026

Issue of Service

Addl. District and Sessions Judge
09-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
09-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 613/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District and Sessions Court, Dindigul dismissed the bail petition filed by three accused (Muralidharan, Sangilimurugan, and Muthupandi) in a criminal case involving serious charges including murder under Section 302 IPC. The court rejected bail primarily because the accused had previously breached bail conditions by failing to appear in court, resulting in non-bailable warrants, and the trial had advanced to the defence evidence stage, making them ineligible for discretionary bail relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.