Govindaraj vs Inspector of Police — 605/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNDG010015562026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

797/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

605/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Dindugul

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

22

Police Station

DCB

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govindaraj

    Adv. REXIN RAJ CHARLES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge Dindigul granted bail to petitioner Govindaraj (A7) in a fraud case involving Rs. 61.4 lakh cheating through forged documents and impersonation, despite his alleged late implication (5 years after occurrence) based on a co-accused's confession. The court imposed bail conditions including Rs. 5 lakh deposit, Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and cooperation with investigation, citing that investigation was nearly complete and co-accused A1 and A4 had already been granted bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Principal District Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 605/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge Dindigul granted bail to petitioner Govindaraj (A7) in a fraud case involving Rs. 61.4 lakh cheating through forged documents and impersonation, despite his alleged late implication (5 years after occurrence) based on a co-accused's confession. The court imposed bail conditions including Rs. 5 lakh deposit, Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and cooperation with investigation, citing that investigation was nearly complete and co-accused A1 and A4 had already been granted bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case