Harish Mohamed vs Sub Inspector of Police — 594/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNDG010015102026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

765/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

594/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Dindugul

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Harish Mohamed

    Adv. Anbarasan Krishnan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul granted bail to Harrish Mohammed (A5) in Criminal Case No. 405/2025, involving charges under the BNS Act related to an alleged vehicle dispute and assault. The court, considering that the material investigation was substantially complete and the petitioner had been in custody for 74 days, approved bail on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including daily police station reporting for 30 days and cooperation with the investigation without threatening witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Principal District Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Principal District Judge

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 594/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul granted bail to Harrish Mohammed (A5) in Criminal Case No. 405/2025, involving charges under the BNS Act related to an alleged vehicle dispute and assault. The court, considering that the material investigation was substantially complete and the petitioner had been in custody for 74 days, approved bail on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including daily police station reporting for 30 days and cooperation with the investigation without threatening witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case