R. Lingammal vs S. Dhandapani — 101/2020

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,163a. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNDG010002012020

Filing Number

88/2020

Filing Date

09-Jan-2020

Registration No

101/2020

Registration Date

14-Feb-2020

Court

Principal District Court, Dindugul

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,163a
Ia/1/2023 Classification : Condonde Delay Application Section Lingammal and others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R. Lingammal

    Adv. K. B. Socraties

  2. 2.Ponnammal

  3. 3.Tamilarasi

  4. 4.Palanisamy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S. Dhandapani

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's compensation claim in this motor vehicle accident case (MCOP.No.101/2020). The judge held that the insurance company was not liable because the Mahindra Max vehicle (weighing 3330 kg) qualifies as a light commercial vehicle, and the driver possessed the requisite license; therefore, the insurer's liability claim was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 21-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  11. 03-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  12. 06-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  13. 15-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  14. 24-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 24-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 24-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  17. 20-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  18. 20-Aug-2025

    Restored

    Principal District Judge

  19. 20-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  20. 26-Apr-2023

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  21. 26-Apr-2023

    Copy of DecreeView PDF

  22. 26-Apr-2023

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  23. 27-Mar-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  24. 20-Mar-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  25. 15-Feb-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  26. 19-Jan-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  27. 14-Dec-2022

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  28. 14-Nov-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  29. 20-Sep-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  30. 10-Aug-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  31. 21-Jun-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  32. 04-Apr-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  33. 22-Feb-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  34. 20-Dec-2021

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  35. 01-Nov-2021

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  36. 13-Sep-2021

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  37. 09-Aug-2021

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  38. 03-Jun-2021

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  39. 01-Apr-2021

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  40. 21-Jan-2021

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  41. 19-Nov-2020

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  42. 12-Aug-2020

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  43. 08-Jul-2020

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  44. 06-May-2020

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  45. 05-May-2020

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  46. 16-Apr-2020

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  47. 26-Mar-2020

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  48. 14-Feb-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 09-Jan-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's compensation claim in this motor vehicle accident case (MCOP.No.101/2020). The judge held that the insurance company was not liable because the Mahindra Max vehicle (weighing 3330 kg) qualifies as a light commercial vehicle, and the driver possessed the requisite license; therefore, the insurer's liability claim was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case