Thazhambur Police Station vs RANJITHKUMAR — 667/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),296(b),115(2),351(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNCG110038102025
e-Filing Number
15-10-2025
Filing Number
3701/2025
Filing Date
16-10-2025
Registration No
667/2025
Registration Date
16-10-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
199
Police Station
THAZHAMBUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thazhambur Police Station
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE THAZHAMBUR LAW AND ORDER
Respondent(s)
RANJITHKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Questioning
Questioning
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 10-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 07-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 05-03-2026 | Questioning |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 667/2025 Court Decision: The District Court in Thiruporur acquitted Ranjithkumar of all charges under IPC sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), and 351(2), applying the benefit of doubt principle. The court found that while the complainant initially alleged the defendant had verbally abused, bound with rope, assaulted, and threatened him on June 20, 2025, the complainant's own testimony in court contradicted the police narrative, rendering the prosecution's case unproven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 667/2025 Court Decision: The District Court in Thiruporur acquitted Ranjithkumar of all charges under IPC sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), and 351(2), applying the benefit of doubt principle. The court found that while the complainant initially alleged the defendant had verbally abused, bound with rope, assaulted, and threatened him on June 20, 2025, the complainant's own testimony in court contradicted the police narrative, rendering the prosecution's case unproven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts