Siva Sm vs Seran Bv Advocate - N.Karunanidhi — 1/2024

Case under The Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 Section 21(2) A, 21(2) B, 21(2) G. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

RLTOP - Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlord and Tenant Original Petition

CNR: TNCG100006402024

Evidence

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

01-02-2024

Filing Number

78/2024

Filing Date

19-02-2024

Registration No

1/2024

Registration Date

20-02-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pallavaram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

Acts & Sections

THE TAMIL NADU REGULATION OF RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF LANDLORDS AND TENANTS ACT, 2017 Section 21(2) A, 21(2) B, 21(2) G
MP/1/2024 Classification : Petition to Set aside Exparte Section Seran BvSampath Sm

Petitioner(s)

Siva Sm

Adv. S Abathsahayam

Sampath Sm

Adv. S Abathsahayam

Respondent(s)

Seran Bv Advocate - N.Karunanidhi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

01-06-2026

Evidence

21-04-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

23-02-2026

Evidence

10-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

02-06-2025
Copy of Deposition

In case RLTOP.No.1/2024 before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate at Pallavaram, the petitioner's examination-in-chief was recorded on June 2, 2025, under CPC 1973 Section 10. A power of attorney document (dated 9/10/2023, registered as Doc No. 75/2023) was marked as evidence by the petitioner. The cross-examination of the witness was adjourned at the request of the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In case RLTOP.No.1/2024 before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate at Pallavaram, the petitioner's examination-in-chief was recorded on June 2, 2025, under CPC 1973 Section 10. A power of attorney document (dated 9/10/2023, registered as Doc No. 75/2023) was marked as evidence by the petitioner. The cross-examination of the witness was adjourned at the request of the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pallavaram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case