Balaji vs CCB Tambaram — 666/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 437. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG060018162026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
1791/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
666/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
33
Police Station
CCB, TAMBARAM
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balaji
Adv. R. Pattusamy
Respondent(s)
CCB Tambaram
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.M.P. No. 666/2026 (Balaji v. State/CCB Tambaram) The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Chengalpattu dismissed Balaji's bail application under Section 480 BNSS. Balaji was arrested for alleged offences under IPC Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 472 (cheating, forgery, and using forged documents) involving high-value property in a prime area. The court rejected his claim of mere signature involvement, finding the offence grave and sensational with investigation at preliminary stage, and concluded he posed risks of absconding, tampering evidence, and reoffending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.M.P. No. 666/2026 (Balaji v. State/CCB Tambaram) The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Chengalpattu dismissed Balaji's bail application under Section 480 BNSS. Balaji was arrested for alleged offences under IPC Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 472 (cheating, forgery, and using forged documents) involving high-value property in a prime area. The court rejected his claim of mere signature involvement, finding the offence grave and sensational with investigation at preliminary stage, and concluded he posed risks of absconding, tampering evidence, and reoffending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts