JOSEPH RAVIRAJAN vs Chengalpattu RPF Police Station — 618/2026
Case under Railway Act 1989 Section 143(1)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 01st April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG060016232026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
1599/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
618/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
518
Police Station
RPF, CHENGALPATTU
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JOSEPH RAVIRAJAN
Adv. CHAKKARAPANI KESAVAN
Respondent(s)
Chengalpattu RPF Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 23-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 16-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: The court dismissed Joseph Ravirajan's petition seeking return of a seized hard disk under sections 497 and 503 of BNSS. The accused owner claimed ownership of the property, but the court held that since a grave Railway Act offense (section 143(1)(a)) involving substantial amounts was registered, returning the property risked disposal/alienation and potential repeat offenses. The seized hard disk remains in police custody as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The court dismissed Joseph Ravirajan's petition seeking return of a seized hard disk under sections 497 and 503 of BNSS. The accused owner claimed ownership of the property, but the court held that since a grave Railway Act offense (section 143(1)(a)) involving substantial amounts was registered, returning the property risked disposal/alienation and potential repeat offenses. The seized hard disk remains in police custody as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts