JOSEPH RAVIRAJAN vs Chengalpattu RPF Police Station — 618/2026

Case under Railway Act 1989 Section 143(1)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG060016232026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

1599/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

618/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet

Judge

9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

518

Police Station

RPF, CHENGALPATTU

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Railway Act 1989 Section 143(1)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JOSEPH RAVIRAJAN

    Adv. CHAKKARAPANI KESAVAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chengalpattu RPF Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: The court dismissed Joseph Ravirajan's petition seeking return of a seized hard disk under sections 497 and 503 of BNSS. The accused owner claimed ownership of the property, but the court held that since a grave Railway Act offense (section 143(1)(a)) involving substantial amounts was registered, returning the property risked disposal/alienation and potential repeat offenses. The seized hard disk remains in police custody as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 618/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court dismissed Joseph Ravirajan's petition seeking return of a seized hard disk under sections 497 and 503 of BNSS. The accused owner claimed ownership of the property, but the court held that since a grave Railway Act offense (section 143(1)(a)) involving substantial amounts was registered, returning the property risked disposal/alienation and potential repeat offenses. The seized hard disk remains in police custody as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case