Arumugam K and 4 others vs Shanmugam G and another — 344/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 24th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNCG010065272024
e-Filing Number
03-12-2024
Filing Number
2854/2024
Filing Date
05-12-2024
Registration No
344/2024
Registration Date
05-12-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arumugam K and 4 others
Adv. MAGALINGAM KANNAIYAN
Munusamy A
Adv. MAGALINGAM KANNAIYAN
Prakash
Adv. MAGALINGAM KANNAIYAN
Alamelu V
Adv. MAGALINGAM KANNAIYAN
Kala A
Adv. MAGALINGAM KANNAIYAN
Respondent(s)
Shanmugam G and another
Karunakaran S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Orders |
| 25-02-2026 | Orders |
| 11-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District Judge granted the Transfer OP, allowing withdrawal of O.S.No.497/2021 from the Principal District Munsif Court at Alandur and transferring it to Sub Court, Alandur for joint trial with O.S.No.366/2021. The court found that both suits involve identical parties and property with overlapping claims (declaration/injunction in 497/2021 and damages/injunction in 366/2021), necessitating joint adjudication to avoid contradictory decisions. The respondents' objection regarding O.S.No.497/2021's partial hearing status was rejected as unsustainable, with the court emphasizing that joint trial would conserve judicial time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District Judge granted the Transfer OP, allowing withdrawal of O.S.No.497/2021 from the Principal District Munsif Court at Alandur and transferring it to Sub Court, Alandur for joint trial with O.S.No.366/2021. The court found that both suits involve identical parties and property with overlapping claims (declaration/injunction in 497/2021 and damages/injunction in 366/2021), necessitating joint adjudication to avoid contradictory decisions. The respondents' objection regarding O.S.No.497/2021's partial hearing status was rejected as unsustainable, with the court emphasizing that joint trial would conserve judicial time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts