Prakash vs Semmancherry Police Station — 826/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),309(4),311,125,324(4),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 02nd April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG010018452026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1092/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

826/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

SEMMANCHERRY

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),309(4),311,125,324(4),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

Prakash

Adv. Hariganesh P

Respondent(s)

Semmancherry Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

02-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Enquiry

16-03-2026

Enquiry

12-03-2026

Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Copy of Order

Summary: CMP No. 826/2026 — Prakash v. Semmancherry Police Station The court dismissed Prakash's bail petition on April 2, 2026. Prakash, arrested on January 14, 2026, was charged with extortion, assault, and criminal intimidation for allegedly waylaying a person, demanding money at knifepoint, stealing Rs. 2,700 and a cellphone, and assaulting him. The court denied bail because Prakash is a habitual offender with eight prior cases, the charges are serious, and there was apprehension he would commit similar offences if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: CMP No. 826/2026 — Prakash v. Semmancherry Police Station The court dismissed Prakash's bail petition on April 2, 2026. Prakash, arrested on January 14, 2026, was charged with extortion, assault, and criminal intimidation for allegedly waylaying a person, demanding money at knifepoint, stealing Rs. 2,700 and a cellphone, and assaulting him. The court denied bail because Prakash is a habitual offender with eight prior cases, the charges are serious, and there was apprehension he would commit similar offences if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case