Prakash vs Semmancherry Police Station — 826/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),309(4),311,125,324(4),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG010018452026

Filing Number

1092/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

826/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

SEMMANCHERRY

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),309(4),311,125,324(4),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prakash

    Adv. Hariganesh P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Semmancherry Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: CMP No. 826/2026 — Prakash v. Semmancherry Police Station The court dismissed Prakash's bail petition on April 2, 2026. Prakash, arrested on January 14, 2026, was charged with extortion, assault, and criminal intimidation for allegedly waylaying a person, demanding money at knifepoint, stealing Rs. 2,700 and a cellphone, and assaulting him. The court denied bail because Prakash is a habitual offender with eight prior cases, the charges are serious, and there was apprehension he would commit similar offences if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 826/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: CMP No. 826/2026 — Prakash v. Semmancherry Police Station The court dismissed Prakash's bail petition on April 2, 2026. Prakash, arrested on January 14, 2026, was charged with extortion, assault, and criminal intimidation for allegedly waylaying a person, demanding money at knifepoint, stealing Rs. 2,700 and a cellphone, and assaulting him. The court denied bail because Prakash is a habitual offender with eight prior cases, the charges are serious, and there was apprehension he would commit similar offences if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case