Muthueswaran vs Tambaram CCB ,Cyber Crime (CCD- — 828/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 61(2),318(4). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG010018412026
Filing Number
1088/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
828/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
23
Police Station
CCB, TAMBARAM
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Muthueswaran
Adv. Abdul rahimon E
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tambaram CCB ,Cyber Crime (CCD-
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: CMP No. 828 of 2026 The court granted bail to Muthueswaran, accused in a cryptocurrency fraud case involving Rs. 3 crores, finding that despite serious allegations, the transactions appeared to be genuine legal investments, he had no criminal history, posed no flight risk with permanent residence, and had already served 42 days in custody. The court imposed conditions including Rs. 10,000 bail with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and restrictions against evidence tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 828/2026
Case Summary: CMP No. 828 of 2026 The court granted bail to Muthueswaran, accused in a cryptocurrency fraud case involving Rs. 3 crores, finding that despite serious allegations, the transactions appeared to be genuine legal investments, he had no criminal history, posed no flight risk with permanent residence, and had already served 42 days in custody. The court imposed conditions including Rs. 10,000 bail with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and restrictions against evidence tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts