Muthueswaran vs Tambaram CCB ,Cyber Crime (CCD- — 828/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 61(2),318(4). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG010018412026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1088/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

828/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

CCB, TAMBARAM

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 61(2),318(4)

Petitioner(s)

Muthueswaran

Adv. Abdul rahimon E

Respondent(s)

Tambaram CCB ,Cyber Crime (CCD-

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

15-04-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

Enquiry

02-04-2026

Enquiry

25-03-2026

Enquiry

18-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: CMP No. 828 of 2026 The court granted bail to Muthueswaran, accused in a cryptocurrency fraud case involving Rs. 3 crores, finding that despite serious allegations, the transactions appeared to be genuine legal investments, he had no criminal history, posed no flight risk with permanent residence, and had already served 42 days in custody. The court imposed conditions including Rs. 10,000 bail with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and restrictions against evidence tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP No. 828 of 2026 The court granted bail to Muthueswaran, accused in a cryptocurrency fraud case involving Rs. 3 crores, finding that despite serious allegations, the transactions appeared to be genuine legal investments, he had no criminal history, posed no flight risk with permanent residence, and had already served 42 days in custody. The court imposed conditions including Rs. 10,000 bail with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and restrictions against evidence tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case