Dhasan vs AWPS Neelangarai Police Station — 804/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),506(1),405,498(A). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG010018102026
Filing Number
1069/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
804/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
3
Police Station
AWPS Neelankarai
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhasan
Adv. Venkatesan J
Respondent(s)
AWPS Neelangarai Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Enquiry
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Orders |
| 16-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 13-03-2026 | Vakalat / Memo of Appearance |
| 11-03-2026 | Vakalat / Memo of Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Dhasan v. AWPS Neelangarai Police Station (804/2026) The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu, dismissed Dhasan's bail petition on March 18, 2026. Dhasan was accused of inducing a Scheduled Caste woman into a relationship under marriage pretense, impregnating her, refusing marriage based on her caste, obtaining ₹2,00,000 and gold without repayment, and abusing her with caste slurs—allegedly leading to two suicide attempts. The court found the gravity of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 506(i), 405, 498(A), and SC/ST Atrocities Act compelling, noting investigation was at preliminary stage and the victim opposed bail, warranting continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Dhasan v. AWPS Neelangarai Police Station (804/2026) The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu, dismissed Dhasan's bail petition on March 18, 2026. Dhasan was accused of inducing a Scheduled Caste woman into a relationship under marriage pretense, impregnating her, refusing marriage based on her caste, obtaining ₹2,00,000 and gold without repayment, and abusing her with caste slurs—allegedly leading to two suicide attempts. The court found the gravity of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 506(i), 405, 498(A), and SC/ST Atrocities Act compelling, noting investigation was at preliminary stage and the victim opposed bail, warranting continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts