Samanthi vs Kelambakkam Police Station — 829/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),351(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG010018082026
Filing Number
1067/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
829/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
71
Police Station
KELAMBAKKAM
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Samanthi
Adv. Logendiran B
Respondent(s)
Kelambakkam Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Enquiry
Enquiry
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Orders |
| 17-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 16-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 12-03-2026 | Vakalat / Memo of Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Samanthi v. State of Tamil Nadu (829/2026) The court granted bail to Samanthi, accused of assault and caste-based abuse under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and BNS, 2023. The court considered that the dispute originated between schoolchildren, the victim was discharged from hospital, and the accused had remained in custody for 13 days. The court found that whether caste-abusive words were actually uttered could only be determined after full trial, particularly given the accused's illiteracy and lack of prior knowledge of the victim's caste. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Samanthi v. State of Tamil Nadu (829/2026) The court granted bail to Samanthi, accused of assault and caste-based abuse under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and BNS, 2023. The court considered that the dispute originated between schoolchildren, the victim was discharged from hospital, and the accused had remained in custody for 13 days. The court found that whether caste-abusive words were actually uttered could only be determined after full trial, particularly given the accused's illiteracy and lack of prior knowledge of the victim's caste. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts