Lokeshwaran alias dori lokesh vs Chengalpattu Town Police Station — 622/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(3), 305(a). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG010014202026
Filing Number
848/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
622/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
780
Police Station
CHENGALPATTU TOWN
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lokeshwaran alias dori lokesh
Adv. M.Muneeswaran
Respondent(s)
Chengalpattu Town Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 05-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 27-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 25-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CMP No. 622/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu dismissed Lokeshwaran's bail petition on 16 March 2026. Lokeshwaran was arrested for theft charges under sections 331(3) and 305(a) of BNS 2023, accused of breaking into a house and stealing 9 sovereigns of gold jewels and Rs. 15,000. Though the court acknowledged that stolen property was recovered and investigation remained incomplete, it denied bail citing his 11 previous criminal cases, the gravity of the offense, and well-settled legal principles requiring consideration of an accused's antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CMP No. 622/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu dismissed Lokeshwaran's bail petition on 16 March 2026. Lokeshwaran was arrested for theft charges under sections 331(3) and 305(a) of BNS 2023, accused of breaking into a house and stealing 9 sovereigns of gold jewels and Rs. 15,000. Though the court acknowledged that stolen property was recovered and investigation remained incomplete, it denied bail citing his 11 previous criminal cases, the gravity of the offense, and well-settled legal principles requiring consideration of an accused's antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts