Deivasigamani vs Sivagami — 234/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d), 27(c). Disposed: Uncontested--Returned on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB170002762022

Filing Number

332/2022

Filing Date

02-Dec-2022

Registration No

234/2022

Registration Date

23-Dec-2022

Court

District Munsif Court, Sulur

Judge

30-District Munsif, Sulur

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Returned

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d), 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Deivasigamani

    Adv. Kuppuraj.A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sivagami

  2. 2.Leelavathi

  3. 3.Maheswari

    Adv. M.Ganeshkumar

  4. 4.Kamalraj

    Adv. M.Ganeshkumar

  5. 5.Gopalakrishnan

    Adv. M.Ganeshkumar

  6. 6.Maragatham

  7. 7.Marathal

    Adv. E.Gopalakrishnan

  8. 8.Rangasamy

    Adv. E.Gopalakrishnan

  9. 9.Easwaramoorthy

    Adv. E.Gopalakrishnan

  10. 10.Chenniappan

    Adv. E.Gopalakrishnan

  11. 11.saraswathi

    Adv. R.N.Anandharaman

  12. 12.Gokilamani

    Adv. R.N.Anandharaman

  13. 13.Shanmugasundaram

    Adv. R.N.Anantharakan

  14. 14.Marathal

    Adv. R.Prabakaran

  15. 15.Nataraj

    Adv. R.Prabakaran

  16. 16.suganthi

    Adv. R.Prabakaran

  17. 17.Suresh

    Adv. R.Prabakaran

  18. 18.Sundrambal

    Adv. K.Deepak

  19. 19.Ambigavathi

    Adv. K.Deepak

  20. 20.Yuvaraj

    Adv. K.Deepak

  21. 21.Bagyalakshmi

    Adv. K.Deepak

  22. 22.Thulasiammal

    Adv. R.N.Anandharaman

  23. 23.Rajkumar

    Adv. R.N.Anandharaman

  24. 24.D.Gopalsamy

  25. 25.R.Saraswathi

    Adv. K.Praburam

  26. 26.J.Shanthamani

    Adv. K.Praburam

  27. 27.S.Vijayalakshmi

    Adv. K.Praburam

  28. 28.R.Azhammal

  29. 29.V.Srinivasan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The District Munsif of Sulur found that the suit value exceeded the court's pecuniary jurisdiction and returned the plaint, directing the plaintiff to file before the appropriate jurisdictional court. Although the judgment details multiple sale deeds and documents the plaintiff sought to declare null and void, the court did not adjudicate the merits due to the jurisdictional limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif, Sulur

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif, Sulur

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif, Sulur

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  8. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  9. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  10. 30-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif, Sulur

  11. 26-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  12. 18-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  13. 10-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  14. 03-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  15. 19-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  16. 11-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  17. 03-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  18. 23-Jan-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  19. 06-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  20. 08-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  21. 27-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  22. 21-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  23. 14-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  24. 10-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  25. 06-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  26. 17-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  27. 16-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  28. 24-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  29. 20-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  30. 30-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  31. 29-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  32. 31-Jan-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  33. 08-Nov-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  34. 21-Oct-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  35. 14-Oct-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  36. 30-Sep-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  37. 31-Jul-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  38. 31-Jan-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  39. 13-Sep-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif, Sulur

  40. 31-Aug-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Sulur

  41. 21-Aug-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Sulur

  42. 20-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  43. 30-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  44. 02-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  45. 15-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  46. 15-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 02-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 234/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The District Munsif of Sulur found that the suit value exceeded the court's pecuniary jurisdiction and returned the plaint, directing the plaintiff to file before the appropriate jurisdictional court. Although the judgment details multiple sale deeds and documents the plaintiff sought to declare null and void, the court did not adjudicate the merits due to the jurisdictional limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case