M.D.Easwaran vs Sarojini — 104/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB170001212025
Filing Number
121/2025
Filing Date
26-08-2025
Registration No
104/2025
Registration Date
08-09-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Sulur
Judge
30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.D.Easwaran
Adv. Kannan.S
Chandra Easwaran
Adv. Kannan.S
Respondent(s)
Sarojini
Velusamy
M/s.Crocus Builders Pvt. Ltd. rep by their power agent M/s. G.Square Realtors Pvt. Ltd.,
M/s Gems Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., rep by power agent M/s.G Square Realtors Pvt. Ltd,
Deep Jyoti Projects Pvt. Ltd., ep by power agent M/s G Square Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
Emaar India Ltd.,rep by power agent M/s.G.Square Realtors Pvt. Ltd.,
Hearing History
Judge: 30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Disposed
Batta
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-02-2026 | Batta |
| 08-01-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 12-12-2025 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 10-11-2025 | Service Pending-Summon |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The District Munsif of Sulur dismissed the suit for default on March 11, 2026. The plaintiffs sought to correct the survey number of a property in a 1986 sale deed from S.F.No.95/2AC to S.F.No.95/2C2, but the suit was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to appear, no representation was made, and the defendant's court fee (Bata) remained unpaid despite multiple opportunities granted by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Munsif of Sulur dismissed the suit for default on March 11, 2026. The plaintiffs sought to correct the survey number of a property in a 1986 sale deed from S.F.No.95/2AC to S.F.No.95/2C2, but the suit was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to appear, no representation was made, and the defendant's court fee (Bata) remained unpaid despite multiple opportunities granted by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts