M.D.Easwaran vs Sarojini — 104/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB170001212025
Filing Number
121/2025
Filing Date
26-Aug-2025
Registration No
104/2025
Registration Date
08-Sep-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Sulur
Judge
30-District Munsif, Sulur
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 18-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M.D.Easwaran
Adv. Kannan.S
-
2.Chandra Easwaran
Adv. Kannan.S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sarojini
-
2.Velusamy
-
3.M/s.Crocus Builders Pvt. Ltd. rep by their power agent M/s. G.Square Realtors Pvt. Ltd.,
-
4.M/s Gems Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., rep by power agent M/s.G Square Realtors Pvt. Ltd,
-
5.Deep Jyoti Projects Pvt. Ltd., ep by power agent M/s G Square Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
-
6.Emaar India Ltd.,rep by power agent M/s.G.Square Realtors Pvt. Ltd.,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of DecreeView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The District Munsif of Sulur dismissed the suit for default on March 11, 2026. The plaintiffs sought to correct the survey number of a property in a 1986 sale deed from S.F.No.95/2AC to S.F.No.95/2C2, but the suit was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to appear, no representation was made, and the defendant's court fee (Bata) remained unpaid despite multiple opportunities granted by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif, Sulur
-
06-Feb-2026
Batta
District Munsif, Sulur
-
08-Jan-2026
Service Pending-Summon
District Munsif, Sulur
-
12-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Summon
District Munsif, Sulur
-
10-Nov-2025
Service Pending-Summon
District Munsif, Sulur
-
27-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Summon
District Munsif, Sulur
-
13-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Summon
District Munsif, Sulur
-
07-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 104/2025
Summary: The District Munsif of Sulur dismissed the suit for default on March 11, 2026. The plaintiffs sought to correct the survey number of a property in a 1986 sale deed from S.F.No.95/2AC to S.F.No.95/2C2, but the suit was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to appear, no representation was made, and the defendant's court fee (Bata) remained unpaid despite multiple opportunities granted by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts