Saranya vs Thangavelu Advocate - M.S. Giridharan — 86/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB170000942020
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
94/2020
Filing Date
15-07-2020
Registration No
86/2020
Registration Date
06-08-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Sulur
Judge
30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saranya
Adv. Arunachalam.R
Pavithra
Adv. Arunachalam.R
Marathal
Adv. Arunachalam.R
Respondent(s)
Thangavelu Advocate - M.S. Giridharan
Hearing History
Judge: 30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 08-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 86/2020 Court: District Munsif, Sulur | Date: 09.03.2026 Petitioner Saranya filed a suit seeking cancellation of a purchase agreement (Document 3630/2003) after her father's death in 2008. During cross-examination, she testified that her father executed a general power of attorney favoring Thangaraj and later a purchase deed without receiving full consideration. The court recorded her testimony regarding disputed property documents, the payment of only ₹10,000 instead of the full amount, and her objections to Thangaraj being made a party. Case status: Cross-examination concluded; judgment pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 86/2020 Court: District Munsif, Sulur | Date: 09.03.2026 Petitioner Saranya filed a suit seeking cancellation of a purchase agreement (Document 3630/2003) after her father's death in 2008. During cross-examination, she testified that her father executed a general power of attorney favoring Thangaraj and later a purchase deed without receiving full consideration. The court recorded her testimony regarding disputed property documents, the payment of only ₹10,000 instead of the full amount, and her objections to Thangaraj being made a party. Case status: Cross-examination concluded; judgment pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts