M/s.R.S.Sales Corporation through its Partner Savithri Devi Kedia vs kokila Advocate - K.Kirthana — 67/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: Issues. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB170000922023
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
92/2023
Filing Date
22-06-2023
Registration No
67/2023
Registration Date
22-06-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Sulur
Judge
30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s.R.S.Sales Corporation through its Partner Savithri Devi Kedia
Adv. M.Saravanan
Savithri Devi Kedia
Adv. M.Saravanan
Seema Kedia
Adv. M.Saravanan
Sangita Kedia , the plaintiffs 1 to 4 rep. through their Power agent Dhanraj Kedia
Respondent(s)
kokila Advocate - K.Kirthana
N.Vijayakumar
Sasikala Devi
Adv. K.Kirthana
Swathi
Adv. K.Kirthana
D.Praveenkumar
Adv. K.Kirthana
K.Natarajan alias Palaniappan
Adv. K.Kirthana
Hearing History
Judge: 30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Issues
Additional Issues
Additional Issues
Additional Issues
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Issues | |
| 18-04-2026 | Additional Issues | |
| 10-04-2026 | Additional Issues | |
| 26-03-2026 | Additional Issues | |
| 25-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary The District Munsif Court at Sulur allowed the amendment petition (I.A. No. 9/2025) filed by R.S. Sales Corporation and its partners on 22 April 2025. The petition sought to amend the original suit (O.S. No. 67/2023) to include allegations that the 6th defendant unlawfully executed a settlement deed without title, and to add a prayer for declaring that settlement deed null and void. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Munsif Court at Sulur allowed the amendment petition (I.A. No. 9/2025) filed by R.S. Sales Corporation and its partners on 22 April 2025. The petition sought to amend the original suit (O.S. No. 67/2023) to include allegations that the 6th defendant unlawfully executed a settlement deed without title, and to add a prayer for declaring that settlement deed null and void. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts