M.Sharmila vs S.Shanmugasundaram — 35/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/s.31,27(c),25(d). Status: Issues. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB170000422025
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
42/2025
Filing Date
25-03-2025
Registration No
35/2025
Registration Date
25-03-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Sulur
Judge
30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Sharmila
Adv. S.Dhamotharan
Respondent(s)
S.Shanmugasundaram
Kalamani
Kandiban
Hearing History
Judge: 30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Issues
Issues
Issues
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Issues |
| 22-01-2026 | Issues |
| 19-12-2025 | Issues |
| 18-12-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 16-12-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by M. Sharmila under Order 39 Rule 1 of CPC seeking temporary injunction against three respondents to protect her easement rights (right of way for ingress and egress) over a property was allowed. The court restrained the respondents and their agents from disturbing the petitioner's easement rights by placing stones, fencing with wire, or showing artificial boundaries in the property until disposal of the main suit, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by M. Sharmila under Order 39 Rule 1 of CPC seeking temporary injunction against three respondents to protect her easement rights (right of way for ingress and egress) over a property was allowed. The court restrained the respondents and their agents from disturbing the petitioner's easement rights by placing stones, fencing with wire, or showing artificial boundaries in the property until disposal of the main suit, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts