M.Sharmila vs S.Shanmugasundaram — 35/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/s.31,27(c),25(d). Status: Issues. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

Issues Next hearing 08-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCB170000422025

Filing Number

42/2025

Filing Date

25-Mar-2025

Registration No

35/2025

Registration Date

25-Mar-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Sulur

Judge

30-District Munsif, Sulur

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section u/s.31,27(c),25(d)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M.Sharmila

    Adv. S.Dhamotharan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S.Shanmugasundaram

  2. 2.Kalamani

  3. 3.Kandiban

Case History

  1. 08-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif, Sulur

  3. 22-Jan-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif, Sulur

  4. 19-Dec-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 19-Dec-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition filed by M. Sharmila under Order 39 Rule 1 of CPC seeking temporary injunction against three respondents to protect her easement rights (right of way for ingress and egress) over a property was allowed. The court restrained the respondents and their agents from disturbing the petitioner's easement rights by placing stones, fencing with wire, or showing artificial boundaries in the property until disposal of the main suit, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif, Sulur

  9. 18-Dec-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  10. 16-Dec-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  11. 05-Dec-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  12. 25-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  13. 14-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  14. 11-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  15. 04-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  16. 29-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  17. 23-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  18. 14-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  19. 07-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  20. 23-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  21. 12-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  22. 01-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  23. 18-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Sulur

  24. 04-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  25. 21-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  26. 10-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  27. 04-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  28. 20-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  29. 06-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Sulur

  30. 26-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 25-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by M. Sharmila under Order 39 Rule 1 of CPC seeking temporary injunction against three respondents to protect her easement rights (right of way for ingress and egress) over a property was allowed. The court restrained the respondents and their agents from disturbing the petitioner's easement rights by placing stones, fencing with wire, or showing artificial boundaries in the property until disposal of the main suit, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case