Pradeesh vs S I OF POLICE VALPARAI POLICE STATION — 28/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 331(4), 305 BNS @ 331(4), 331, 305 BNS. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCB150000922026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
85/2026
Filing Date
14-03-2026
Registration No
28/2026
Registration Date
14-03-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valparai
Judge
1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
42
Police Station
Valparai police station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pradeesh
Adv. R R PERUMAL
Subash
Adv. R R PERUMAL
Respondent(s)
S I OF POLICE VALPARAI POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 16-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 14-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 28/2026 Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valparai dismissed the bail petition filed by Prathesh and Subash on 18 March 2026. The accused were arrested for offences under Sections 331(4), 305, and 313 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and remanded to judicial custody on 08.03.2026 and 12.03.2026 respectively. While the defence argued innocence and offered sureties, the court rejected bail after considering the prosecution's concerns that a pending previous case existed, and that releasing the accused risked evidence tampering and threat to the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 28/2026 Summary The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Valparai dismissed the bail petition filed by Prathesh and Subash on 18 March 2026. The accused were arrested for offences under Sections 331(4), 305, and 313 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and remanded to judicial custody on 08.03.2026 and 12.03.2026 respectively. While the defence argued innocence and offered sureties, the court rejected bail after considering the prosecution's concerns that a pending previous case existed, and that releasing the accused risked evidence tampering and threat to the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts