Gurusamy vs Rajanarayanan — 44/2025

Case Summary Petition Dismissed. The Additional District Munsif, Pollachi dismissed Gurusamy's petition seeking ad-interim injunction to protect his claimed easement right over a 12-feet cart track (B schedule property) through respondent Rajanarayanan's land to access his agricultural property. The court found the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, as he could not prove any legitimate mode of acquiring the easement—neither by grant (no written agreement), necessity (properties not recently severed), nor prescription (usage was permissive, not hostile). The court noted documentary evidence (Ex.R3 sale deed) limited any access right to only 6 links width, contradicting petitioner's broader claim. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.