R Chandrasekaran vs THE MANAGEMENT KSB LIMITED REP BY ITS DIRECTOR,151, METTUPALAYM ROAD, N.S.N PALAYAM, COIMBATORE Advocate - A. Shanmugavadivel — 24/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C2. Status: Mediation. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
CP - Claim Petition
CNR: TNCB040000622024
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-04-2024
Filing Number
62/2024
Filing Date
10-05-2024
Registration No
24/2024
Registration Date
07-06-2024
Court
Labour Court, Coimbatore
Judge
5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R Chandrasekaran
Adv. Sathish Shankar
Respondent(s)
THE MANAGEMENT KSB LIMITED REP BY ITS DIRECTOR,151, METTUPALAYM ROAD, N.S.N PALAYAM, COIMBATORE Advocate - A. Shanmugavadivel
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Mediation
Mediation
Mediation
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Mediation |
| 27-04-2026 | Mediation |
| 21-04-2026 | Mediation |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 case (CP 24/2024), the Primary Labour Court at Coimbatore recorded the cross-examination of witness PW1 (R. Chandrasekaran) on 18.03.2026. The witness, a driver who worked for 7 years, testified regarding a case filed under Section 711/1999 seeking 50% back wages and reinstatement. The court noted that a higher court had ordered 50% back wages (₹35,350) be paid and the worker reinstated, though the worker claimed he was entitled to full wages from November 1998 onwards. The cross-examination was adjourned at the defense counsel's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 case (CP 24/2024), the Primary Labour Court at Coimbatore recorded the cross-examination of witness PW1 (R. Chandrasekaran) on 18.03.2026. The witness, a driver who worked for 7 years, testified regarding a case filed under Section 711/1999 seeking 50% back wages and reinstatement. The court noted that a higher court had ordered 50% back wages (₹35,350) be paid and the worker reinstated, though the worker claimed he was entitled to full wages from November 1998 onwards. The cross-examination was adjourned at the defense counsel's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts