A.Abdul Majith vs NEPC Tea Garden Limited — 5/2019

Case under Plantation Labour Act,1951 Section 33(c)(2). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.

CP - Claim Petition

CNR: TNCB040000042019

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

20th May 2026

Filing Number

4/2019

Filing Date

05-01-2019

Registration No

5/2019

Registration Date

07-01-2019

Court

Labour Court, Coimbatore

Judge

41-Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court

Acts & Sections

Plantation Labour Act,1951 Section 33(c)(2)

Petitioner(s)

A.Abdul Majith

Adv. VGS.Anbunarayananan

Respondent(s)

NEPC Tea Garden Limited

Waterfall Estate Group Advocate - Mr.S.Muruganandam R1, Tmt.Rajeswari R2

Hearing History

Judge: 41-Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court

22-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

11-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

19-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

23-01-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

05-01-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

15-12-2020
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary Case No.: C.P. No. 5/2019 Date: 15.12.2020 The court continued the examination of witness MW 2 (Thiru.A. Ashok Kumar) and heard cross-examination arguments. The second respondent's administration challenged an order (I.D. No. 76/2011) by filing a writ petition (W.P. No. 35092/2019) in the High Court and a stay petition (W.M.P. No. 35884/2019), which remains pending. The court found the petitioner's submitted documents relevant to the case and ruled that the petitioner's arguments are admissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: C.P. No. 5/2019 Date: 15.12.2020 The court continued the examination of witness MW 2 (Thiru.A. Ashok Kumar) and heard cross-examination arguments. The second respondent's administration challenged an order (I.D. No. 76/2011) by filing a writ petition (W.P. No. 35092/2019) in the High Court and a stay petition (W.M.P. No. 35884/2019), which remains pending. The court found the petitioner's submitted documents relevant to the case and ruled that the petitioner's arguments are admissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Labour Court, Coimbatore All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case