Murugan vs Inspector of Police, Vadavalli Police Station. — 871/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010017382026

Filing Number

1213/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

871/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Murugan

    Adv. MANIVEL R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Vadavalli Police Station.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge granted bail to 25-year-old Murugan, accused of voyeurism and assault charges under BNS sections 115(2), 118(1), 296(b), 351(3), 77, 78 and TNPHW Act Section 4, after he spent 39 days in judicial custody. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, twice-daily sign-ins for 30 days, and restrictions against absconding or tampering with evidence, while noting the victim's minor injuries and lack of prior criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 871/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge granted bail to 25-year-old Murugan, accused of voyeurism and assault charges under BNS sections 115(2), 118(1), 296(b), 351(3), 77, 78 and TNPHW Act Section 4, after he spent 39 days in judicial custody. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, twice-daily sign-ins for 30 days, and restrictions against absconding or tampering with evidence, while noting the victim's minor injuries and lack of prior criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case