U. Satheeshwaran vs Inspector of Police, Kuniyamuthur Police Station. — 802/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010015852026

Filing Number

1104/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

802/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

30

Police Station

B14 Kuniyamuthur Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.U. Satheeshwaran

    Adv. JAYAKUMAR V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Kuniyamuthur Police Station.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dismissed the bail petition of U. Satheeshwaran (age 24) who was accused of robbery and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 309(4) and 311. The court denied bail despite the petitioner having spent 43 days in judicial custody, citing the serious nature of offences, multiple pending cases against him (including one for murder under IPC section 302), and ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 802/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dismissed the bail petition of U. Satheeshwaran (age 24) who was accused of robbery and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 309(4) and 311. The court denied bail despite the petitioner having spent 43 days in judicial custody, citing the serious nature of offences, multiple pending cases against him (including one for murder under IPC section 302), and ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case