S SYED IDRIS vs STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARUMBUKKADAI — 772/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010015052026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

1048/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

772/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S SYED IDRIS

    Adv. MUHAMEDMUSTAFA I

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARUMBUKKADAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of S. Syed Idris (age 26) filed under Section 482 of BNSS for alleged offences under Sections 81, 318(3), 351(2) of BNS and Section 4 of TNPHW Act. The petitioner was accused of having sexual intercourse with a woman on promise of marriage, then refusing to marry her, cheating her, and threatening her with dire consequences. The court declined to grant anticipatory bail considering the nature of the offence, the allegations, the early stage of investigation, and prosecution's opposition to bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 772/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of S. Syed Idris (age 26) filed under Section 482 of BNSS for alleged offences under Sections 81, 318(3), 351(2) of BNS and Section 4 of TNPHW Act. The petitioner was accused of having sexual intercourse with a woman on promise of marriage, then refusing to marry her, cheating her, and threatening her with dire consequences. The court declined to grant anticipatory bail considering the nature of the offence, the allegations, the early stage of investigation, and prosecution's opposition to bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case