S SYED IDRIS vs STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARUMBUKKADAI — 772/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCB010015052026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

1048/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

772/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

S SYED IDRIS

Adv. MUHAMEDMUSTAFA I

Respondent(s)

STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARUMBUKKADAI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

11-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

Enquiry

26-02-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of S. Syed Idris (age 26) filed under Section 482 of BNSS for alleged offences under Sections 81, 318(3), 351(2) of BNS and Section 4 of TNPHW Act. The petitioner was accused of having sexual intercourse with a woman on promise of marriage, then refusing to marry her, cheating her, and threatening her with dire consequences. The court declined to grant anticipatory bail considering the nature of the offence, the allegations, the early stage of investigation, and prosecution's opposition to bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of S. Syed Idris (age 26) filed under Section 482 of BNSS for alleged offences under Sections 81, 318(3), 351(2) of BNS and Section 4 of TNPHW Act. The petitioner was accused of having sexual intercourse with a woman on promise of marriage, then refusing to marry her, cheating her, and threatening her with dire consequences. The court declined to grant anticipatory bail considering the nature of the offence, the allegations, the early stage of investigation, and prosecution's opposition to bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Coimbatore All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case