Amarchand vs Kamlesh Etc. — 2/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 12th March 2026.
Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL
CNR: RJSG090001352025
Filing Number
60/2025
Filing Date
06-03-2025
Registration No
2/2025
Registration Date
06-03-2025
Court
ADJ ANOOPGARH TALUKA
Judge
2-ADJ II
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Amarchand
Adv. RAMESH KUMAR SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
Kamlesh Etc.
Dalki
SUB REGISTRAR
District Collector
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADJ II
Disposed
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-02-2026 | Compliance |
| 12-01-2026 | Compliance |
| 10-12-2025 | Compliance |
| 21-11-2025 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Amarchand v. Kamlesh & Others (2025) Court Decision: The appeal by Amarchand was dismissed. The appellate court upheld the trial court's order rejecting Amarchand's suit, finding that he lacks standing to challenge property documents without first establishing tenancy rights through revenue courts. Key Reasoning: Amarchand sought to invalidate a forged will (dated 10.11.2003) and a deed (dated 14.01.2025) transferring agricultural land. However, since Amarchand's tenancy/khatedari rights over the disputed agricultural property remain undeclared by revenue authorities, civil courts cannot grant relief. The court held that only after revenue courts formally recognize tenancy rights can civil courts subsequently declare documents void as a consequential remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Amarchand v. Kamlesh & Others (2025) Court Decision: The appeal by Amarchand was dismissed. The appellate court upheld the trial court's order rejecting Amarchand's suit, finding that he lacks standing to challenge property documents without first establishing tenancy rights through revenue courts. Key Reasoning: Amarchand sought to invalidate a forged will (dated 10.11.2003) and a deed (dated 14.01.2025) transferring agricultural land. However, since Amarchand's tenancy/khatedari rights over the disputed agricultural property remain undeclared by revenue authorities, civil courts cannot grant relief. The court held that only after revenue courts formally recognize tenancy rights can civil courts subsequently declare documents void as a consequential remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts