Amarchand vs Kamlesh Etc. — 2/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 12th March 2026.

Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL

CNR: RJSG090001352025

Case disposed

Filing Number

60/2025

Filing Date

06-03-2025

Registration No

2/2025

Registration Date

06-03-2025

Court

ADJ ANOOPGARH TALUKA

Judge

2-ADJ II

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96

Petitioner(s)

Amarchand

Adv. RAMESH KUMAR SOLANKI

Respondent(s)

Kamlesh Etc.

Dalki

SUB REGISTRAR

District Collector

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADJ II

12-03-2026

Disposed

17-02-2026

Compliance

12-01-2026

Compliance

10-12-2025

Compliance

21-11-2025

Compliance

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: Amarchand v. Kamlesh & Others (2025) Court Decision: The appeal by Amarchand was dismissed. The appellate court upheld the trial court's order rejecting Amarchand's suit, finding that he lacks standing to challenge property documents without first establishing tenancy rights through revenue courts. Key Reasoning: Amarchand sought to invalidate a forged will (dated 10.11.2003) and a deed (dated 14.01.2025) transferring agricultural land. However, since Amarchand's tenancy/khatedari rights over the disputed agricultural property remain undeclared by revenue authorities, civil courts cannot grant relief. The court held that only after revenue courts formally recognize tenancy rights can civil courts subsequently declare documents void as a consequential remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Amarchand v. Kamlesh & Others (2025) Court Decision: The appeal by Amarchand was dismissed. The appellate court upheld the trial court's order rejecting Amarchand's suit, finding that he lacks standing to challenge property documents without first establishing tenancy rights through revenue courts. Key Reasoning: Amarchand sought to invalidate a forged will (dated 10.11.2003) and a deed (dated 14.01.2025) transferring agricultural land. However, since Amarchand's tenancy/khatedari rights over the disputed agricultural property remain undeclared by revenue authorities, civil courts cannot grant relief. The court held that only after revenue courts formally recognize tenancy rights can civil courts subsequently declare documents void as a consequential remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADJ ANOOPGARH TALUKA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case