STATE vs Udailal Advocate - Madanlal Tak — 862/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,120b. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

REG. CRI. CASE

CNR: RJRS070015782015

Filing Number

1794/2015

Filing Date

15-Dec-2015

Registration No

862/2015

Registration Date

15-Dec-2015

Court

ACJM JM Nathdwara Taluka

Judge

4-Jm No.2

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,120b

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Udailal Advocate - Madanlal Tak

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Judgement/OrderView PDF

    The court acquitted three accused persons (Udaylal, Arjunlal, and Deshbai) of charges under IPC Sections 420, 406, and 120-B, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while land was transferred to the accused through a sale deed, the evidence did not establish fraudulent deception with dishonest intent from the inception of the transaction—a key requirement for proving cheating under Section 420 IPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jm No.2

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm No.2

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm No.2

  8. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 19-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm No.2

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  11. 13-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm No.2

  12. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  13. 12-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm No.2

  14. 11-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm No.2

  15. 27-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  16. 27-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm No.2

  17. 21-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  18. 21-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm No.2

  19. 20-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm No.2

  20. 07-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  21. 07-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm No.2

  22. 15-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 07-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  24. 08-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 26-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  26. 16-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 05-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  28. 28-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  29. 16-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  30. 18-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  31. 16-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  32. 26-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  33. 25-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  34. 15-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  35. 10-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  36. 01-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  37. 06-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  38. 06-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  39. 17-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  40. 29-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  41. 18-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  42. 13-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  43. 01-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  44. 17-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  45. 17-Feb-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  46. 30-Sep-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  47. 17-Jun-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  48. 29-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  49. 16-Jan-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  50. 04-Oct-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  51. 09-Aug-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  52. 24-May-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  53. 16-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  54. 30-Nov-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  55. 15-Sep-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  56. 19-Jun-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  57. 21-Feb-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  58. 09-Dec-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  59. 10-Nov-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  60. 05-Aug-2017

    Evicence

    Acjm

  61. 25-Apr-2017

    Evicence

    Acjm

  62. 08-Apr-2017

    Evicence

    Acjm

  63. 19-Jan-2017

    Evicence

    Acjm

  64. 16-Nov-2016

    Evicence

    Acjm

  65. 05-Oct-2016

    Evicence

    Acjm

  66. 15-Jul-2016

    Evicence

    Acjm

  67. 22-Apr-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  68. 15-Dec-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 862/2015

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted three accused persons (Udaylal, Arjunlal, and Deshbai) of charges under IPC Sections 420, 406, and 120-B, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while land was transferred to the accused through a sale deed, the evidence did not establish fraudulent deception with dishonest intent from the inception of the transaction—a key requirement for proving cheating under Section 420 IPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case