JHUNJHUNU SAHKARI BHUMI VIKAS BANK LTD. vs BHAGWATI Advocate - SH. GIRDHARI LAL SAINI — 172/2019

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJJH070001452019

Case disposed

Filing Number

143/2019

Filing Date

29-01-2019

Registration No

172/2019

Registration Date

06-03-2019

Court

ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ

Judge

3-JM

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

JHUNJHUNU SAHKARI BHUMI VIKAS BANK LTD.

Adv. SH. SUNIL RAJORIA

Respondent(s)

BHAGWATI Advocate - SH. GIRDHARI LAL SAINI

RAMSAVROOP

Hearing History

Judge: 3-JM

25-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

Final arguments

16-03-2026

Final arguments

13-03-2026

Defence Evidence

12-03-2026

Defence Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Copy of document.

Case Summary: CIS 172/2019 Court Decision (25 March 2026): The Jhunjhunu Cooperative Land Development Bank filed a cheque dishonor case against Ramsavroop under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The accused was charged with issuing a cheque (No. 151663 dated 29-11-2018) for Rs. 77,045 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found the bank established all legal requirements: the cheque was issued for a loan, presented for payment, dishonored, and notice was properly served. The accused failed to prove any valid defense despite claiming the loan was partly paid or questioning the cheque's authenticity. The court convicted the accused and acquitted him on the ground that the bank's evidence sufficiently proved the offense, with the accused's acquittal being justified based on evidentiary burden standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CIS 172/2019 Court Decision (25 March 2026): The Jhunjhunu Cooperative Land Development Bank filed a cheque dishonor case against Ramsavroop under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The accused was charged with issuing a cheque (No. 151663 dated 29-11-2018) for Rs. 77,045 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found the bank established all legal requirements: the cheque was issued for a loan, presented for payment, dishonored, and notice was properly served. The accused failed to prove any valid defense despite claiming the loan was partly paid or questioning the cheque's authenticity. The court convicted the accused and acquitted him on the ground that the bank's evidence sufficiently proved the offense, with the accused's acquittal being justified based on evidentiary burden standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case