JHUNJHUNU SAHKARI BHUMI VIKAS BANK LTD. vs BHAGWATI Advocate - SH. GIRDHARI LAL SAINI — 172/2019
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJJH070001452019
Filing Number
143/2019
Filing Date
29-01-2019
Registration No
172/2019
Registration Date
06-03-2019
Court
ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ
Judge
3-JM
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JHUNJHUNU SAHKARI BHUMI VIKAS BANK LTD.
Adv. SH. SUNIL RAJORIA
Respondent(s)
BHAGWATI Advocate - SH. GIRDHARI LAL SAINI
RAMSAVROOP
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JM
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CIS 172/2019 Court Decision (25 March 2026): The Jhunjhunu Cooperative Land Development Bank filed a cheque dishonor case against Ramsavroop under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The accused was charged with issuing a cheque (No. 151663 dated 29-11-2018) for Rs. 77,045 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found the bank established all legal requirements: the cheque was issued for a loan, presented for payment, dishonored, and notice was properly served. The accused failed to prove any valid defense despite claiming the loan was partly paid or questioning the cheque's authenticity. The court convicted the accused and acquitted him on the ground that the bank's evidence sufficiently proved the offense, with the accused's acquittal being justified based on evidentiary burden standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CIS 172/2019 Court Decision (25 March 2026): The Jhunjhunu Cooperative Land Development Bank filed a cheque dishonor case against Ramsavroop under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The accused was charged with issuing a cheque (No. 151663 dated 29-11-2018) for Rs. 77,045 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found the bank established all legal requirements: the cheque was issued for a loan, presented for payment, dishonored, and notice was properly served. The accused failed to prove any valid defense despite claiming the loan was partly paid or questioning the cheque's authenticity. The court convicted the accused and acquitted him on the ground that the bank's evidence sufficiently proved the offense, with the accused's acquittal being justified based on evidentiary burden standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts