JHUNJHUNU SAHKARI BHUMI VIKAS BANK LTD. vs BHAGWATI Advocate - SH. GIRDHARI LAL SAINI — 172/2019

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJJH070001452019

Filing Number

143/2019

Filing Date

29-Jan-2019

Registration No

172/2019

Registration Date

06-Mar-2019

Court

ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ

Judge

3-Jm

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JHUNJHUNU SAHKARI BHUMI VIKAS BANK LTD.

    Adv. SH. SUNIL RAJORIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAGWATI Advocate - SH. GIRDHARI LAL SAINI

  2. 2.RAMSAVROOP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Case Summary: CIS 172/2019 Court Decision (25 March 2026): The Jhunjhunu Cooperative Land Development Bank filed a cheque dishonor case against Ramsavroop under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The accused was charged with issuing a cheque (No. 151663 dated 29-11-2018) for Rs. 77,045 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found the bank established all legal requirements: the cheque was issued for a loan, presented for payment, dishonored, and notice was properly served. The accused failed to prove any valid defense despite claiming the loan was partly paid or questioning the cheque's authenticity. The court convicted the accused and acquitted him on the ground that the bank's evidence sufficiently proved the offense, with the accused's acquittal being justified based on evidentiary burden standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Jm

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Jm

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Jm

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 03-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 16-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 07-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 07-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 31-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 26-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 29-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 26-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 06-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 18-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 20-Apr-2024

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Jm

  21. 03-Feb-2024

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  22. 17-Jan-2024

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  23. 04-Dec-2023

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  24. 06-Oct-2023

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  25. 17-Aug-2023

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  26. 21-Jun-2023

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  27. 11-May-2023

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  28. 28-Feb-2023

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  29. 21-Nov-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  30. 31-Aug-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  31. 01-Jun-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  32. 08-Apr-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  33. 14-Feb-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  34. 11-Dec-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  35. 24-Nov-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  36. 01-Sep-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  37. 11-Jun-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  38. 15-Mar-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  39. 08-Feb-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  40. 08-Feb-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  41. 17-Dec-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  42. 07-Oct-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  43. 18-Jun-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  44. 30-Apr-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  45. 17-Jan-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  46. 18-Nov-2019

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  47. 29-Aug-2019

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  48. 30-May-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 29-Jan-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 172/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CIS 172/2019 Court Decision (25 March 2026): The Jhunjhunu Cooperative Land Development Bank filed a cheque dishonor case against Ramsavroop under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The accused was charged with issuing a cheque (No. 151663 dated 29-11-2018) for Rs. 77,045 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found the bank established all legal requirements: the cheque was issued for a loan, presented for payment, dishonored, and notice was properly served. The accused failed to prove any valid defense despite claiming the loan was partly paid or questioning the cheque's authenticity. The court convicted the accused and acquitted him on the ground that the bank's evidence sufficiently proved the offense, with the accused's acquittal being justified based on evidentiary burden standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case