STATE vs SYAM@SYAMSUNDAR@ DEWRAJ Advocate - SRI UMEED SINGH — 7311/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 120B,406,420,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 06th April 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: RJJH020000272014
Filing Number
11336/2014
Filing Date
06-02-2014
Registration No
7311/2014
Registration Date
06-02-2014
Court
CJM ACJM JM Jhunjhunu District HQ
Judge
4-Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
271
Police Station
Police Station Kotwali Jhunjhunun
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Adv. APP
NARESH PALIWAL@NAVEEN@RAJEEV VARMA
SHOYAB@SHOBI
Respondent(s)
SYAM@SYAMSUNDAR@ DEWRAJ Advocate - SRI UMEED SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgment
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 30-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: State v. Shyam @ Shyamsundar @ Dewraj and Others (Case 7311/2014) The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhunjhunu acquitted five accused persons of charges under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, and 120B IPC in a bank check fraud case. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the accused's identification at the crime scene, the forgery of three checks totaling ₹40 lakhs, or the necessary elements of cheating and criminal breach of trust. The judgment emphasized that the investigator admitted no records confirmed the accused's presence in Jhunjhunu, bank staff denied recognizing them, and the account holder himself acknowledged issuing the checks—contradicting the forgery allegation and rendering the prosecution's handwriting expert evidence insufficient without corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: State v. Shyam @ Shyamsundar @ Dewraj and Others (Case 7311/2014) The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhunjhunu acquitted five accused persons of charges under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, and 120B IPC in a bank check fraud case. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the accused's identification at the crime scene, the forgery of three checks totaling ₹40 lakhs, or the necessary elements of cheating and criminal breach of trust. The judgment emphasized that the investigator admitted no records confirmed the accused's presence in Jhunjhunu, bank staff denied recognizing them, and the account holder himself acknowledged issuing the checks—contradicting the forgery allegation and rendering the prosecution's handwriting expert evidence insufficient without corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts