Rajesh Kumar vs Namit Ojha Advocate - Babu Lal Saini — 169/2015

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Ni Act - Negotiable Instrument Act

CNR: RJCH020016952015

Filing Number

1464/2015

Filing Date

18-May-2015

Registration No

169/2015

Registration Date

07-Nov-2015

Court

CJM ACJM JM DISTRCIT HQ CHURU

Judge

4-Civil Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajesh Kumar

    Adv. Narendra Sihag

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Namit Ojha Advocate - Babu Lal Saini

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Civil Judge

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge

  9. 05-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge

  10. 04-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge

  11. 24-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge

  12. 23-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge

  13. 19-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  14. 16-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  15. 11-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  16. 10-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  17. 06-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  18. 05-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  19. 02-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  20. 23-Jan-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  21. 17-Jan-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  22. 24-Dec-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  23. 12-Dec-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  24. 25-Nov-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  25. 27-Oct-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  26. 16-Oct-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  27. 14-Oct-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  28. 23-Sep-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

  29. 20-Aug-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  30. 02-Aug-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  31. 19-Jul-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  32. 11-Jul-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Civil Judge

  33. 05-Jun-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge

  34. 14-May-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge

  35. 23-Apr-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge

  36. 11-Apr-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge

  37. 20-Mar-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge

  38. 05-Feb-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge

  39. 10-Jan-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge

  40. 26-Nov-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge

  41. 08-Oct-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge

  42. 11-Sep-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge

  43. 25-Jul-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge

  44. 29-Jun-2024

    Compliance

    Civil Judge

  45. 15-May-2024

    Compliance

    Civil Judge

  46. 07-Mar-2024

    Compliance

    Civil Judge

  47. 09-Jan-2024

    Compliance

    Civil Judge

  48. 21-Oct-2023

    Compliance

    Civil Judge

  49. 28-Aug-2023

    Compliance

    Civil Judge

  50. 19-Jun-2023

    Compliance

    Civil Judge

  51. 19-Apr-2023

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge

  52. 17-Feb-2023

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Civil Judge

  53. 19-Nov-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Civil Judge

  54. 09-Sep-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Civil Judge

  55. 18-Aug-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Civil Judge

  56. 25-Jul-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Civil Judge

  57. 28-Jun-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Civil Judge

  58. 22-Apr-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  59. 21-Jan-2022

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  60. 25-Oct-2021

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  61. 10-Aug-2021

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  62. 09-Aug-2021

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  63. 24-May-2021

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  64. 16-Apr-2021

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  65. 18-Jan-2021

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  66. 05-Oct-2020

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  67. 27-May-2020

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  68. 14-Feb-2020

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  69. 29-Nov-2019

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  70. 19-Jul-2019

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  71. 03-Apr-2019

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  72. 11-Jan-2019

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  73. 28-Sep-2018

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  74. 31-May-2018

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  75. 05-Mar-2018

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  76. 03-Mar-2018

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  77. 10-Feb-2018

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  78. 01-Dec-2017

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  79. 16-Sep-2017

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Sr Civil Judge

  80. 10-Sep-2017

    Summons

    Sr Civil Judge

  81. 21-Apr-2017

    Summons

    Sr Civil Judge

  82. 08-Apr-2017

    Summons

    Sr Civil Judge

  83. 27-Feb-2017

    Summons

    Sr Civil Judge

  84. 14-Dec-2016

    Summons

    Sr Civil Judge

  85. 16-Sep-2016

    Summons

    Sr Civil Judge

  86. 19-Jul-2016

    Summons

    Sr Civil Judge

  87. 03-Jun-2016

    Summons

    Sr Civil Judge

  88. 23-Apr-2016

    Summons

    Sr Civil Judge

  89. 27-Feb-2016

    Summons

    Sr Civil Judge

  90. 07-Nov-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  91. 18-May-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 169/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused Namit Ojha of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. While the complainant established that a cheque for ₹1,00,000 was issued and dishonored, the court found the complainant failed to prove his financial capacity to have lent such amount, especially after the accused challenged this capacity. The court held that in cash loan cases, when the accused questions the complainant's financial ability, the complainant bears the burden to prove the source and capacity, which was not discharged through credible documentary evidence or independent witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case