Sanju vs Ranaram Advocate - Narendra Singh rathore — 102/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 25th March 2026.
MACT Main - MACP
CNR: RJCH010012292022
Filing Number
274/2022
Filing Date
13-07-2022
Registration No
102/2022
Registration Date
15-07-2022
Court
DJ ADJ DISTRICT HQ CHURU
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanju
Adv. Yogesh Sharma
Gokul Ram
Adv. Yogesh Sharma
Respondent(s)
Ranaram Advocate - Narendra Singh rathore
National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Adv. Dhirendra Singh Rathore
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 102/2022 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the claim petition filed by Sanju (widow) and Gokul Ram (father) seeking compensation of ₹1,20,39,200 for the death of Pawan Kumar in a motor accident. The tribunal found that the claimants failed to examine any eyewitness to prove that the motorcycle was driven recklessly by defendant Ranaram, and therefore could not establish liability against the vehicle owner or insurance company, particularly regarding pillion rider coverage which was excluded from the policy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 102/2022 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the claim petition filed by Sanju (widow) and Gokul Ram (father) seeking compensation of ₹1,20,39,200 for the death of Pawan Kumar in a motor accident. The tribunal found that the claimants failed to examine any eyewitness to prove that the motorcycle was driven recklessly by defendant Ranaram, and therefore could not establish liability against the vehicle owner or insurance company, particularly regarding pillion rider coverage which was excluded from the policy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts