Sanju vs Ranaram Advocate - Narendra Singh rathore — 102/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACT Main - MACP

CNR: RJCH010012292022

Filing Number

274/2022

Filing Date

13-Jul-2022

Registration No

102/2022

Registration Date

15-Jul-2022

Court

DJ ADJ DISTRICT HQ CHURU

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanju

    Adv. Yogesh Sharma

  2. 2.Gokul Ram

    Adv. Yogesh Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ranaram Advocate - Narendra Singh rathore

  2. 2.National Insurance Co. Ltd.

    Adv. Dhirendra Singh Rathore

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary of Case 102/2022 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the claim petition filed by Sanju (widow) and Gokul Ram (father) seeking compensation of ₹1,20,39,200 for the death of Pawan Kumar in a motor accident. The tribunal found that the claimants failed to examine any eyewitness to prove that the motorcycle was driven recklessly by defendant Ranaram, and therefore could not establish liability against the vehicle owner or insurance company, particularly regarding pillion rider coverage which was excluded from the policy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  10. 05-Feb-2026

    Judgment

    District and Sessions Judge

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  12. 22-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  13. 15-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  14. 18-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  15. 04-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  16. 27-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  17. 09-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  18. 21-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  19. 21-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  20. 10-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  21. 22-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  22. 27-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  23. 06-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  24. 05-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  25. 17-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  26. 08-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  27. 27-Jun-2024

    Issues

    District and Sessions Judge

  28. 24-May-2024

    Issues

    District and Sessions Judge

  29. 16-May-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  30. 28-Mar-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  31. 15-Feb-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  32. 09-Dec-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  33. 23-Nov-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  34. 12-Oct-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  35. 14-Sep-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  36. 24-Aug-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  37. 27-Jul-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  38. 15-Jun-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District and Sessions Judge

  39. 20-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  40. 16-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  41. 15-Dec-2022

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  42. 12-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  43. 10-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  44. 20-Oct-2022

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  45. 15-Sep-2022

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  46. 06-Aug-2022

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District and Sessions Judge

  47. 15-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 13-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 102/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 102/2022 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the claim petition filed by Sanju (widow) and Gokul Ram (father) seeking compensation of ₹1,20,39,200 for the death of Pawan Kumar in a motor accident. The tribunal found that the claimants failed to examine any eyewitness to prove that the motorcycle was driven recklessly by defendant Ranaram, and therefore could not establish liability against the vehicle owner or insurance company, particularly regarding pillion rider coverage which was excluded from the policy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case