Rajasthan Goverment vs Madan @ Puspender etc. Advocate - Kamlesh Dubey — 537/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 13th March 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJBR050009192017
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
661/2017
Filing Date
13-12-2017
Registration No
537/2017
Registration Date
13-12-2017
Court
SCST Baran HQ
Judge
2-Judge Spl Court
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation
FIR Details
FIR Number
303
Police Station
Atru Police Station
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajasthan Goverment
Adv. spp
Respondent(s)
Madan @ Puspender etc. Advocate - Kamlesh Dubey
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judge Spl Court
Disposed
Final arguments
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 07-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 26-02-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 18-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court upheld the conviction of two individuals under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for criminal intimidation and caste-based abuse, finding the evidence and witness testimonies credible. The court sentenced them to imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹1,400 each, rejecting their appeals while directing deposit of the fine amount in court within one month, with failure to comply resulting in further imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court upheld the conviction of two individuals under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for criminal intimidation and caste-based abuse, finding the evidence and witness testimonies credible. The court sentenced them to imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹1,400 each, rejecting their appeals while directing deposit of the fine amount in court within one month, with failure to comply resulting in further imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts