JASWANT SINGH vs KALYAN GUJAR — 3028/2018

Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 06th June 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJBE020056792018

Case disposed

Filing Number

5665/2018

Filing Date

11-10-2018

Registration No

3028/2018

Registration Date

17-07-2018

Court

CJM ACJM JM - BEAWAR District HQ

Judge

4-ACJM

Decision Date

06th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Sentenced

Petitioner(s)

JASWANT SINGH

Respondent(s)

KALYAN GUJAR

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ACJM

06-06-2026

Disposed

04-06-2026

Prosecution Evidence

02-06-2026

Prosecution Evidence

21-05-2026

Prosecution Evidence

15-04-2026

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

06-06-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: Jaswant Singh v. Kalyan Gujar (CIS 3028/2018) Court Decision (dated 06-06-2026): The court convicted defendant Kalyan Gujar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring five cheques totaling ₹20,00,000. The court found that Gujar borrowed ₹20 lakh from petitioner Jaswant Singh on 31-03-2016, issued five post-dated cheques as repayment security (dated 07-05-2018 to 11-05-2018), which were dishonored with "Insufficient Funds" remarks. Despite legal notice, Gujar failed to pay within 15 days. The court rejected the defense argument that no actual loan transaction occurred, as the original agreement and cheques bearing Gujar's signatures proved the transaction. Sentence: 6 months imprisonment plus ₹25,00,000 compensation to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Jaswant Singh v. Kalyan Gujar (CIS 3028/2018) Court Decision (dated 06-06-2026): The court convicted defendant Kalyan Gujar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring five cheques totaling ₹20,00,000. The court found that Gujar borrowed ₹20 lakh from petitioner Jaswant Singh on 31-03-2016, issued five post-dated cheques as repayment security (dated 07-05-2018 to 11-05-2018), which were dishonored with "Insufficient Funds" remarks. Despite legal notice, Gujar failed to pay within 15 days. The court rejected the defense argument that no actual loan transaction occurred, as the original agreement and cheques bearing Gujar's signatures proved the transaction. Sentence: 6 months imprisonment plus ₹25,00,000 compensation to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CJM ACJM JM - BEAWAR District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case