JASWANT SINGH vs KALYAN GUJAR — 3028/2018
Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 06th June 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBE020056792018
Filing Number
5665/2018
Filing Date
11-10-2018
Registration No
3028/2018
Registration Date
17-07-2018
Court
CJM ACJM JM - BEAWAR District HQ
Judge
4-ACJM
Decision Date
06th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Sentenced
Petitioner(s)
JASWANT SINGH
Respondent(s)
KALYAN GUJAR
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ACJM
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-06-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 02-06-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 21-05-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 15-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Jaswant Singh v. Kalyan Gujar (CIS 3028/2018) Court Decision (dated 06-06-2026): The court convicted defendant Kalyan Gujar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring five cheques totaling ₹20,00,000. The court found that Gujar borrowed ₹20 lakh from petitioner Jaswant Singh on 31-03-2016, issued five post-dated cheques as repayment security (dated 07-05-2018 to 11-05-2018), which were dishonored with "Insufficient Funds" remarks. Despite legal notice, Gujar failed to pay within 15 days. The court rejected the defense argument that no actual loan transaction occurred, as the original agreement and cheques bearing Gujar's signatures proved the transaction. Sentence: 6 months imprisonment plus ₹25,00,000 compensation to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Jaswant Singh v. Kalyan Gujar (CIS 3028/2018) Court Decision (dated 06-06-2026): The court convicted defendant Kalyan Gujar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring five cheques totaling ₹20,00,000. The court found that Gujar borrowed ₹20 lakh from petitioner Jaswant Singh on 31-03-2016, issued five post-dated cheques as repayment security (dated 07-05-2018 to 11-05-2018), which were dishonored with "Insufficient Funds" remarks. Despite legal notice, Gujar failed to pay within 15 days. The court rejected the defense argument that no actual loan transaction occurred, as the original agreement and cheques bearing Gujar's signatures proved the transaction. Sentence: 6 months imprisonment plus ₹25,00,000 compensation to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts