State vs Jagdish Prasad Advocate - MOHD. SHAREEF — 85/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 337, 338. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJBD140002102024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
206/2024
Filing Date
04-04-2024
Registration No
85/2024
Registration Date
04-04-2024
Court
JM Indergarh Taluka
Judge
1-JM
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
199
Police Station
Indergarh
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
Jagdish Prasad Advocate - MOHD. SHAREEF
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JM
Disposed
Final arguments
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-02-2026 | Final arguments | |
| 20-02-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 08-01-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 17-12-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The Judicial Magistrate, Indragarh (Rajasthan) acquitted the accused Jagdish Prasad Rathore of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash/negligent driving causing injury). Although the prosecution proved a motorcycle accident on 01-09-2023 caused serious injuries to two persons, it failed to establish that the accused was the driver of the offending vehicle (registration RJ08CB6170). No eyewitness identified the accused as the driver, and no test identification parade was conducted, leaving reasonable doubt about the vehicle's operator at the time of the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The Judicial Magistrate, Indragarh (Rajasthan) acquitted the accused Jagdish Prasad Rathore of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash/negligent driving causing injury). Although the prosecution proved a motorcycle accident on 01-09-2023 caused serious injuries to two persons, it failed to establish that the accused was the driver of the offending vehicle (registration RJ08CB6170). No eyewitness identified the accused as the driver, and no test identification parade was conducted, leaving reasonable doubt about the vehicle's operator at the time of the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts