PRAKASH CHAND BAIRWA vs RADHESHYAM BHAMBHI AND OTHERS — 14/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39, R1, R2. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled by ADR on 09th May 2026.
Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)
CNR: RJAJ170002792024
Filing Number
103/2024
Filing Date
26-03-2024
Registration No
14/2024
Registration Date
26-03-2024
Court
ADJ KISHANGARH TALUKA
Judge
2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Decision Date
09th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled by ADR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAKASH CHAND BAIRWA
Adv. PARMANAND SHARMA
Respondent(s)
RADHESHYAM BHAMBHI AND OTHERS
RAJU BAIRWA
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
State
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Disposed
Compliance
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 19-01-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Prakash Chand Bairwa v. Radheshyam Bhambhi (14/2024) The court dismissed respondents' application to reject the plaintiff's suit under CPC Order 7, Rule 11, holding that civil courts have jurisdiction over suits alleging fraud and forgery in sale deeds involving agricultural land. The court found the suit triable and rejected precedent arguments that jurisdiction was barred by Section 207 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, as the plaintiff held recorded tenure rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Prakash Chand Bairwa v. Radheshyam Bhambhi (14/2024) The court dismissed respondents' application to reject the plaintiff's suit under CPC Order 7, Rule 11, holding that civil courts have jurisdiction over suits alleging fraud and forgery in sale deeds involving agricultural land. The court found the suit triable and rejected precedent arguments that jurisdiction was barred by Section 207 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, as the plaintiff held recorded tenure rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts