Pragati Ganapat Kare vs Shobhabai Namdev kare Advocate - Ingle N.G. — 89/2025

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHYA110022562025

Awaiting Summons

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

e-Filing Number

14-08-2025

Filing Number

171/2025

Filing Date

14-08-2025

Registration No

89/2025

Registration Date

18-08-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Umarkhed

Judge

1-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate F.C., Umarkhed

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 6

Petitioner(s)

Pragati Ganapat Kare

Adv. Chavan R.W.

Pratik Ganapat Kare

Respondent(s)

Shobhabai Namdev kare Advocate - Ingle N.G.

Ganapat Namdev kare

Mandabai Bhaksar Thite

Lakshmibai Subhash Mane

Narmada Ashok Mane

Sheetal Tulshiram Hodgir

Varsha Aavadhut Gadade

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate F.C., Umarkhed

29-04-2026

Awaiting Summons

01-04-2026

Awaiting Summons

12-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

06-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

21-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

15-10-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court granted the plaintiff's application for Status Quo in this partition suit (Pragati v. Shobhabai) concerning agricultural land at Ningnur. The court directed both parties to maintain the status quo regarding the suit properties until the filing of the written statement, as the defendants had given an undertaking not to transfer the property and the plaintiff failed to provide documentary evidence of any imminent sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted the plaintiff's application for Status Quo in this partition suit (Pragati v. Shobhabai) concerning agricultural land at Ningnur. The court directed both parties to maintain the status quo regarding the suit properties until the filing of the written statement, as the defendants had given an undertaking not to transfer the property and the plaintiff failed to provide documentary evidence of any imminent sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division Umarkhed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case