Pragati Ganapat Kare vs Shobhabai Namdev kare Advocate - Ingle N.G. — 89/2025
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHYA110022562025
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
14-08-2025
Filing Number
171/2025
Filing Date
14-08-2025
Registration No
89/2025
Registration Date
18-08-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Umarkhed
Judge
1-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate F.C., Umarkhed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pragati Ganapat Kare
Adv. Chavan R.W.
Pratik Ganapat Kare
Respondent(s)
Shobhabai Namdev kare Advocate - Ingle N.G.
Ganapat Namdev kare
Mandabai Bhaksar Thite
Lakshmibai Subhash Mane
Narmada Ashok Mane
Sheetal Tulshiram Hodgir
Varsha Aavadhut Gadade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and Judicial Magistrate F.C., Umarkhed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 01-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 12-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 06-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 21-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted the plaintiff's application for Status Quo in this partition suit (Pragati v. Shobhabai) concerning agricultural land at Ningnur. The court directed both parties to maintain the status quo regarding the suit properties until the filing of the written statement, as the defendants had given an undertaking not to transfer the property and the plaintiff failed to provide documentary evidence of any imminent sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted the plaintiff's application for Status Quo in this partition suit (Pragati v. Shobhabai) concerning agricultural land at Ningnur. The court directed both parties to maintain the status quo regarding the suit properties until the filing of the written statement, as the defendants had given an undertaking not to transfer the property and the plaintiff failed to provide documentary evidence of any imminent sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts