Satish Bhagvanlal Jaiswal vs Nagar Parishad Pusad — 112/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section Section34and37. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHYA050032372025
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
e-Filing Number
29-07-2025
Filing Number
604/2025
Filing Date
30-07-2025
Registration No
112/2025
Registration Date
30-07-2025
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division Pusad
Judge
17-3rd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Pusad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Satish Bhagvanlal Jaiswal
Adv. Deshmukh V.B.
Respondent(s)
Nagar Parishad Pusad
Hearing History
Judge: 17-3rd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Pusad
Steps
Citation
Citation
Citation
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Steps |
| 16-04-2026 | Citation |
| 12-03-2026 | Citation |
| 11-02-2026 | Citation |
| 28-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case: Satish Vs Nagar Parishad Pusad (RCS 112/2025) Outcome: The application for addition of party under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC is allowed. The court directed the plaintiff to add applicant Sachin Vishwasrao Naik (Pusad Congress Committee vice president) as a defendant to the suit and file an amended plaint, finding him a necessary party given the disputed encroachment issues that require proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case: Satish Vs Nagar Parishad Pusad (RCS 112/2025) Outcome: The application for addition of party under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC is allowed. The court directed the plaintiff to add applicant Sachin Vishwasrao Naik (Pusad Congress Committee vice president) as a defendant to the suit and file an amended plaint, finding him a necessary party given the disputed encroachment issues that require proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts