State of Maharashtra Through P. S. Kalamb vs Vikki Nilkanth Kamble — 105/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1). Status: Fixing date of Hearing. Next hearing: 28th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHYA010020532025
Next Hearing
28th May 2026
Filing Number
713/2025
Filing Date
25-09-2025
Registration No
105/2025
Registration Date
25-09-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
18-District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal
FIR Details
FIR Number
345
Police Station
P.S.Kalamb
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through P. S. Kalamb
Adv. A.P.P. Shri M. S. Gangalwar
Respondent(s)
Vikki Nilkanth Kamble
Hearing History
Judge: 18-District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing |
| 30-04-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing |
| 20-04-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing |
| 06-04-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing |
| 23-03-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application of Vikki Kamble under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been rejected. The Additional Sessions Judge found prima facie evidence against the accused, including an extra-judicial confession before witnesses and recovery of the deceased's broken mobile handset at the accused's instance. The court concluded the offense is serious in nature and the accused poses a risk of tampering with witnesses, thereby denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application of Vikki Kamble under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been rejected. The Additional Sessions Judge found prima facie evidence against the accused, including an extra-judicial confession before witnesses and recovery of the deceased's broken mobile handset at the accused's instance. The court concluded the offense is serious in nature and the accused poses a risk of tampering with witnesses, thereby denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts