Motiram Tukaram Thakre vs Ramrao Bhimrao Thakare and 2 Advocate - CHAUDHARI PRAVIN NANASAHEB — 1900020/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SuitforPermanentInjunction. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 28th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS090002372014
Next Hearing
28th July 2026
Filing Number
1900033/2014
Filing Date
02-07-2014
Registration No
1900020/2014
Registration Date
02-07-2014
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Manora
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Motiram Tukaram Thakre
Adv. THAKARE RAMPRASAD DHANURDHAR
Respondent(s)
Ramrao Bhimrao Thakare and 2 Advocate - CHAUDHARI PRAVIN NANASAHEB
Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Kolar, Tq. Manora, Dist. Washim
Adv. MANDAOGADE RAJESH DADARAO
Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Kolar, Tq. Manora, Dist. Washim
Adv. MANDAOGADE RAJESH DADARAO
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 16-04-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No. 20/2014 (Motiram v. Ramrao) The court allowed plaintiff's belated application to amend his plaint and deposit Rs. 400/-, despite being filed five months after the court's September 2017 deadline. The court imposed Rs. 200/- cost on the plaintiff payable to defendant in the interest of justice, and directed expeditious completion of the amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 20/2014 (Motiram v. Ramrao) The court allowed plaintiff's belated application to amend his plaint and deposit Rs. 400/-, despite being filed five months after the court's September 2017 deadline. The court imposed Rs. 200/- cost on the plaintiff payable to defendant in the interest of justice, and directed expeditious completion of the amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts