Motiram Tukaram Thakre vs Ramrao Bhimrao Thakare and 2 Advocate - CHAUDHARI PRAVIN NANASAHEB — 1900020/2014

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SuitforPermanentInjunction. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 28th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHWS090002372014

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Next Hearing

28th July 2026

Filing Number

1900033/2014

Filing Date

02-07-2014

Registration No

1900020/2014

Registration Date

02-07-2014

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Manora

Judge

4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section SuitforPermanentInjunction

Petitioner(s)

Motiram Tukaram Thakre

Adv. THAKARE RAMPRASAD DHANURDHAR

Respondent(s)

Ramrao Bhimrao Thakare and 2 Advocate - CHAUDHARI PRAVIN NANASAHEB

Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Kolar, Tq. Manora, Dist. Washim

Adv. MANDAOGADE RAJESH DADARAO

Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Kolar, Tq. Manora, Dist. Washim

Adv. MANDAOGADE RAJESH DADARAO

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora

10-06-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

16-04-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

16-03-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

11-02-2026

Evidence

21-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

07-01-2015
Order on T.I.
17-02-2018
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: RCS No. 20/2014 (Motiram v. Ramrao) The court allowed plaintiff's belated application to amend his plaint and deposit Rs. 400/-, despite being filed five months after the court's September 2017 deadline. The court imposed Rs. 200/- cost on the plaintiff payable to defendant in the interest of justice, and directed expeditious completion of the amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 20/2014 (Motiram v. Ramrao) The court allowed plaintiff's belated application to amend his plaint and deposit Rs. 400/-, despite being filed five months after the court's September 2017 deadline. The court imposed Rs. 200/- cost on the plaintiff payable to defendant in the interest of justice, and directed expeditious completion of the amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division, Manora All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case