Prakash Mahadu alies Mahadaji Walke vs Mahadu alies Mahadaji Namaji Walke Advocate - Narwade Ravindra Pandharirao — 95/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHWS080013062024

e-Filing Number

18-10-2024

Filing Number

273/2024

Filing Date

21-Oct-2024

Registration No

95/2024

Registration Date

21-Oct-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Risod

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prakash Mahadu alies Mahadaji Walke

    Adv. CHOPADE PRABHAKAR RUSTUMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahadu alies Mahadaji Namaji Walke Advocate - Narwade Ravindra Pandharirao

  2. 2.Chandrabhaga Bhagwan Galande

  3. 3.Ambadas Mahadu alies Mahadaji Walke

  4. 4.Janabai Jagannath Mutkule

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-May-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  7. 05-Dec-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  8. 06-Nov-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  9. 04-Oct-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  10. 12-Sep-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  11. 12-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Prakash v. Mahadu & Ors. (95/2024) The defendants' application to set aside the "no written statement" (no w.s.) order and obtain permission to file their written statement was ALLOWED. The court granted permission for defendants to file their written statement, subject to payment of Rs. 300/- costs. The court found the defendants' reasons for delay unjustifiable but allowed the application considering the parties' rights and nature of the suit, as permitting the written statement would not prejudice the plaintiff and would ensure the case is disposed of on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 12-Aug-2025

    Compliance

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  13. 22-Jul-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  14. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  15. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  16. 19-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  17. 14-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  18. 07-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  19. 27-Nov-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

  20. 22-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 21-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 95/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Prakash v. Mahadu & Ors. (95/2024) The defendants' application to set aside the "no written statement" (no w.s.) order and obtain permission to file their written statement was ALLOWED. The court granted permission for defendants to file their written statement, subject to payment of Rs. 300/- costs. The court found the defendants' reasons for delay unjustifiable but allowed the application considering the parties' rights and nature of the suit, as permitting the written statement would not prejudice the plaintiff and would ensure the case is disposed of on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case